Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Without Chavez, Ahmedinejad, NAM is missing its 'bad boys'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Nam summit
    The media room has journalists wondering which world leader to chase for bites.

    Without the presence of 21st century enfant terrible of the Middle East Mohammad Ahmadinejad, the towering personality of Fidel Castro or the biting wit of Venezuelian President Hugo Chavez, the 15th Non-Aligned Movement Summit meet lacks the glamour element.

    The media room has journalists wondering which world leader to chase for bites. Ultimately the general consensus is that it can only be India-Pakistan talks, whether they happen or not, that can really be the only 'story'.

    Even the once flamboyant Muammar Gaddafi seems like an aged lion dressed in orange robes and purple turban. All he could say was "We are the world" referring to the over 100 heads of government of mostly developing nations who have gathered here in Sharm-el-Sheikh.

    Gaddafi called for reforms of the United Nations, which he said should better, represent developing countries' interests. "We are facing new challenges and we need to reconsider, re-evaluate the international situation in order for the world to benefit from this huge gathering," he said.

    Ads by Google

    Iranian President still smarting from the election fiasco gave this summit a miss. Iran is a member of NAM and the chair of the coming summit in 2012. However, Egypt's relations with Iran are lukewarm as Egypt opposes what it considers Iran's interference in the Arab affairs. So when the Egyptian President extended the invitation to Ahmadinejad, it was accepted initially but later it was declined and Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki came instead.

    But he too suddenly left Egypt for Iran Tuesday afternoon after the 15th ministerial meeting of the NAM leading to speculation that Ahmadinejad might suddenly turn up on Thursday. But it did not happen.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Indeed I also feel it is bad journalismBy: Sridhar | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Though a supporter of the reactionary Indian Express, I felt the heading of this news item with 'bad boys' is unwarranted. Trying to make a story without one.
    Without Chavez, Ahmedinejad, NAM is missing its 'bad boys'By: Ratan Gupta | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward By challenging the "Holocaust Manufacturing and Loot Corporation" (HMLC), Ahmedenjad has without any doubt proven to the world that he does not give hoot to anybody. HMLC has looted trillions in the mysterious stories of Holocaust.
    all you foolsBy: blindpplcommenton IE | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward try and read the article and don't comment after reading the headline you headless morons!!!
    PuppetsBy: Manju | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward "In today's world, not many can have that effect on crowds. Most world leaders are slaves to teleprompter or Ivy League speech writers. Or worse, bureaucrats from the stable."....and the "Garfield" PM of India is puppet of whom?? C'mon IE, this is reporting at it's worst. Do you consider Iran/Cuba/Venezuela etc enemy of India. Or do you consider Pak as bossom buddy just because it's an ally of US? what bullhoney!!
    Stop this non-sense language.By: Avinash Baranwal | 16-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward IE is reporting cheap now.How can you say them Bad boys?This way you are working against nation's interest. Such kind of reporting and language will damage relations of India with Iran and Cuba. You are doing a crime against this nation. Enemy of US may not an enemy of India. This is an irresponsible reporting.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.