Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Women’s Bill quota: Nitish quietly disagrees with his party chief Sharad

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Nitish

    Not too long ago, JD(U) colleagues Nitish Kumar and Sharad Yadav were united in their demand of a sub-quota for “deprived, marginalised” women in the Women’s Reservation Bill. Today, however, as party chief Sharad Yadav continues his bitter opposition, the Bihar Chief Minister, it is learnt, does not want to be seen as opposing the Bill, if not actively supporting it.

    There’s a vigorous debate in the party fuelled by Kumar himself and a meeting of the JD(U) national executive is likely to be called to settle it.

    Sources said Kumar called up his party MPs to say that his views on the Bill had “changed” and that he does not want to be seen as “anti-women.” Said one MP who received the call: “He said his opinion on reservation for women has changed. I told him he should talk to Sharad Yadav so that the party comes out with a clear stand.”

    When contacted, Kumar was diplomatic. Not mentioning the quota within the quota as demanded by Sharad Yadav, he said: “I will not say anything now. Let the government come up with the form of the Bill it wants to table and then I will give my opinion”, he told The Indian Express.

    Ads by Google

    When pressed to comment on Yadav’s sub-quota demand within the Bill’s 33% quota, Kumar said: “I will not say anything beyond what I have said. However, it is a matter of satisfaction for me that the Centre has adopted the Bihar model and proposed to reserve 50% of seats in rural and urban bodies for women”.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    DON'T CHEAT MORE------By: MAN SINGH | 13-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward what a nonsence type acts are given priority by our so called leaders?If Sonia and Bhagava brigade are realy keen to give apportunity to women and deprived people of India they should priortise and focus on corruption.The 100 day priority of govt.must include the point of corruption in politics and beaurocracy.They are trying to mislead Indians and seems to not learn a lession from US.Americans normaly having hate with muslims were compelled to elect Obama.Indian politicians are targetting the populer means of corruption like distribution of Mid day meal,Fertilizer subcidy to industrilists,reservation debate,and other sentmental issues like ram temple and ramsetu for exploiting more than 100 cr.Indians comfortably.Why they are not keen to promise that no Satyam,Telgi,Harsad mehta ,boforse type scandals will occur after next 100 days of governance?Why they are not keen to know that 70% of population especially Kisan and Mazdoors of India want the every piece of land to be irrigated?
    Judges and the Bureaucrats needed to have a good heart to instil fairness and reasonable justice.By: P.K.Chandran | 11-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward What is the use of passing new bills or enacting a law while the major grievances of the common citizen is neglected i.e.1. Disciplined ex-serviceman's land grabbed, who has addressed to all civil authorities in the state and the centre, filed a suit in the City Civil Court, Bangalore, the heartless lady judge did not have the heart to realise as to how badly the exserviceman's heart was hurt, feeling for his hard-earned property being snatched. The local opposite party forcefully removing the boundary laid pillars and barbed wire and erecting a katcha shed and blackmailing him. Where is the "Law and Order" or justice in the country, which is only for the influenced or the politicians. Who will come forward to serve the nation from external threats if this is the state of the exserviceman who is made to suffer. Is their a moral responsibility for the Govt.Registration Dept. who had collected considerable Registration Fees to register the Sale Deed of exserviceman's land.
    Women's Reservation BillBy: K.K.Ammannaya | 11-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Nitish Kumar has lot of common sense.By opposing the bill all the three Yadavs will conyinue to lose all elections in the days to come.
    Women's Reservation BillBy: M.S.Kamath | 11-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward Any reservation should be for a limited period. Women's reservation bill should be passed without any delay with time limit included in it.
    Nitish and women`s reservation billBy: SVS Subrahmaniam | 11-Jun-2009 Reply | Forward After the 2009 elections every party is undergoing some type of “Manthan” including running congress party. In this process, Nitish also is having a second thought of the hardened view on the women reservation bill. When every body is talking of the bill to be passed positively now, he may be feeling their stand in this issue may brand them “anti women”. The assembly elections are also nearing (though not very near) he does not want it a hurdle in the aiming win. But as there is general reservation policy of the voters in the constitution, why it can not be incorporated in this bill now itself so that the fears of all people will be cleared and the doubt of domination of upper cast people? What ever said and done, still the domination of upper class and the discrimination of the others on the society is not ruled out. What is the aim or politics in implementing the reservation policy in the bill? Will it be difficult to implement it or is there any politics also to gain advantage?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.