‘People will not believe that Modi is innocent’

Look who's talking by Arun on 2008-09-26 13:08:18.657914+05:30
Look who's talking. One who supports a govt. which orchaestrated anti-sikh riots in 1984 is now shamelessly blaming Modi. I pray that Modi becomes the PM one day and punish all these wolves just fooling people and enjoying in the name of fake secularism.

NANAVATI REPORT by N.V.SANKARAN on 2008-09-26 13:02:36.03366+05:30
Sir,The reactions from different people/political parties against the Nanavati Commission’s report are interesting and to some extend comical.In order to understand it properly, one should look into the chronology of events after the Godhra train burning. The initial reaction from everybody, including the secular media was that the bogey was suspected to be burned from outside by some Islamist activists. The 3rd day after that there was very strong backlash against the Muslim community all over Gujarat. Then, in order to pacify the Muslim sentiments, the secularists said that the Kar Sevaks quarreled with some of the Muslim vendors and the train burning was the result of that quarrel. Later, the Congress and other secular parties realized that such observation would put the local Muslims in bad light and they suggested that the train burning was a conspiracy by the Hindutwa brigade and that the Kar Sevaks burned themselves to tarnish the image of the Muslims. When his view was rubbished by most people, they propagated that the incident was an accident and that there was no Muslim involved in that. Later, when the UPA came to power, they appointed a pliant judge Mr. U.C. Bannerji, to submit a report confirming that it was indeed an accident. The BJP has, understandably, welcomed the Nanavati commission report and claims that it has brought the truth out. The Congress spokesman said, the findings of the commission was as expected as the Nanavati Commission was appointed by Mr. Modi. He seems to forget that the Baannerji commission report was also on expected lines since that commission was instituted by Mr. Lalu Prasad, a proclaimed BJP and Modi hater. The Congress also says that submission of the report in part was politically motivated with an eye on the coming elections. Here again, they forget that the interim report of the Bannergi Commission was published less than one month before the Bihar elections. What was their motive for publishing that interim report just before the elections?Mr. Lalu Prasad says the incident could not have been a conspiracy, but he has no logical reason to suggest so, except that he does not want the Muslims to be implicated, come whatever may. Mrs. Teesta Setalvad says that submitting of the commission’s report in part while the cases were running in the Supreme court was unconstitutional. But she does not find anything unconstitutional in the publication of the Bannergi Commission’s interim report. Was it not a part of the complete report?That Mr. Bannergee stands by his findings are only a natural reaction from any human being in his position.

commission reports on violence by venkatesh kotian on 2008-09-26 12:06:08.761946+05:30
Nanavati commission report or any other commission report all are eyewash, fooling the people. Every time any violence take place some commissions are appointed and respective Governments wash their hands. Truth never comes out crores of Rupees being spent on these commissions. Why Should the people of this Country trust the commissions, police or politicians. One or the other political parties are involved in such violence.

Communalisation of India by Vidyadhar on 2008-09-26 11:45:32.51752+05:30
All thses communal polarisation could have been avoided had the three sacrad places, Ayodhya, Bararas and Mathura temples had been restored and the mosques standing at these palces been shifted to someother place. Pseudo secularism is the root cause of all the bane India is facing

nanavathi report by prakash on 2008-09-26 10:33:10.537071+05:30
Lau first stop supporting SIMI and other jihadi terrorist organisation.modi is in three times power how he managed all natural calamities and devloped the state what u did for devlopment of bihar.gujarat people given good verdict for modi in last state election .modi no need to get certificate from u.because of terrorist organisations supporters like you and mulayam terrorism is growimg.keep quite.

Lalluu the joker by Bihari on 2008-09-26 10:13:12.207017+05:30
And who believes in laloo !!! We have voted or rather booted him out and brought in a sober and hard working Nitish. Let laloo the joker play politics on ever obliging new channels. Ground realities are very diffrent and he knows it. Ha ha ha ha

Lallu SIMI Prasad by venkat on 2008-09-26 10:11:25.799523+05:30
Lallu Simi Prasad is a super thief. He was defeated in the elections. He has become a Minister only because the Congress party did not have a majority. So they gathered people like Lallu to rule the country. Hence this country is suffering.

Nanavati Report by Anil on 2008-09-26 10:05:37.138833+05:30
We Indian people cannot expect more than this from so called Thekedar of Secular forces. If a judge find whatever suits to Mr Lalu and CPM then he would have rewarded by these people like Mr Banerjee did. Since this finding do not suit people like Mr Lalu, CPM or any other political party, they will go to blaim anyone whatever post he hold. This is tragedy to Indian people that we can remove these politicians who are hurdles in growth of India and are intrested in their own intrest of befooling people like us.

SO called Seculars by Shirish Ganu on 2008-09-26 09:43:30.482554+05:30
Whats more interesting than the article are the comments posted. Mr. Irfan talked about "we" ruled for 800 hundred years. I want to ask him what has happened to His community today after their 800 year "Rule". Poverty, desperation, driven like heard of goats by Ulema and maulavees. This trend of "Jihad" only Allah knows with whom! has spread deep in to highly educated muslims. It tells us something about the faith and religion. I myself dont believe in such reports by any committee as all of them are only to safegaurd someones personal interests and not to find truth. But yes I would rather go with Modi and Raj thakre than with Lalu, Mulayam, Abu azmi, Arjunsingh, and Soniyaji. Modi really shines as a new hope of revival of great Bharat dream left in between by Atalji, and forgotten by UPA. Muslim pockets like Azamgarh, deoband are the birth places of terror and so called seculars are busy protecting their vote banks by protecting terrorists.

lalu the liar by inderjeet singh on 2008-09-26 09:16:56.963159+05:30
I FEEL PEOPLE LIKE LALU HAS NOT RIGHT TO COMMET WHOIS ONE OF THE BIGGEST LIARS OF THE CENTURY LIKE FODDER SCAM I HOPE PEOPLE HAVE NOT FORGOTTEN THAT HAS HE BEEN SO POPULAR PEOPLE FROM BIHAR WOULD NOT KICKED HIM OUT LIKE A FLY FROM MILK. IT IS SAD PEOPLE LIKE MANMONHAN SINGH HAS ALSO LOST CREDIBILTY BY SHAKING HANDS WITH PEOPLE LIKE LALLU THE LIAR AND A JOCKER IN INDIAN PARLIMENT. MODI IS MILLIONS TIMES BETTER HE ATLEAST DOES NOT CHANGE HIS STAND WHO WANT TO HAVE CHAATI IN MUMBAI CHALLENGING THE THACKERYS HAS HE GUTS TO DO THE SAME TAMILNADU PLEASE DONOT I REPAT DONOT TRUST SHRI LALU JI MAHARAJ

Does anyone believe what Lalu says! by Hanglur on 2008-09-26 09:16:17.91478+05:30
These rogues like Lalus, Manmohan Singhs, Paswan, Yechuries, Karats, Gowdas etc could sleep peacefully, happily and soundly when they saw the train burning and cries of Hindus caught inside the train and grieving relatives of train-burning victims. I suggest them to convert to Muslim and reform Muslims so that all terrorist activities are stopped. Even Mohammad-bin-Tughalak would not told that victims closed the train doors and put fire on themselves just put blames on Muslim community as Lalu's Bannergee report made us to believe. Lalu should not know that nobody including his own wife would not believe what he says.

Godhra verdict by R.Balasundaram on 2008-09-26 08:59:52.133465+05:30
For Lalu 'SIMI' is a national outfit; all sangh parivar outfits,nay,any organisation connected with HINDUS , are otlaws and should be banned! No one can say Modi is anti national or supporting terror.Any verdict by acommission headed by supreme court judge should be considered with respect; otherwise people will lose faith in supreme court itself. Whether Banerjee is right or Nanavati is right, Supreme court should adjudicate. President should seek intervention of SC. Till such time all concerned , particularly media,should keep their mouth shut!keep

laloo's defence of SECULARISM by vasudev on 2008-09-26 08:55:01.501134+05:30
No moderate hindus would have become communal, had Afzal guru been hanged, had tough laws against terror be enacted, had reservations based on religion not enforced, had dubious conversions been stopped.....there is an endless list. Laloo ji we are not your foolish vote bank to be fooled. what do the riots in gujarath have to do with the terror nursery in azamgarh. if there is connection, then the entire hindu community should have turned terrorists when kashmiri hindus were killed, raped and driven out of their homes. Why is it that the bombs go off only in areas with seizable hindu population and temples. Even in the recent delhi blasts case, not one bomb went off in Jamia nagar. These questions are not very difficult to answer. islam wants to gobble the entire subcontinent and laloos / mulayams / teestas / vinod mehtas are their foot soldiers.

Nanaji ki report by Irfan on 2008-09-26 08:29:15.716433+05:30
See we have also ruled for 800 years and had we have done 10% of what is being done in this era, there would have been no question of majoirity and minority in this country.

Lallu the Great!!! by Krishna on 2008-09-26 08:22:11.987711+05:30
Lallu who cares for your comments!!! The guy who should have been behind bars for ruining Bihar is commenting on others' so called misdeeds. Paradox is that this type of bafoons are invited to address IIMS graduates.

Lallu always Sullu ('Sullu' in Kannada Lie) by Prabhakar Wagle on 2008-09-26 08:05:38.113387+05:30
People will deffinetly believe Modi but not Lallu

similallu/fernandeslallu/khanlallu by indian on 2008-09-26 07:59:16.401261+05:30
Mr.similallu you may be right in your thinking ! because you have already decided to become either muslim or christian. All hindus should not have any relation with you or your family. Do you listen SIMILALLU ? We hindus( now you are not a hindu !) know what is right or wrong ?

Islam and terrorism by Grizzly Bear on 2008-09-26 07:48:18.739957+05:30
If islam were to be ever clothed in the garb of political idealogy (which it anyways is) instead of speaking of it as religion it demonstrates a lot of fascism in it. That is what breeds terrorists. You need both hands to clap. Lalu, Paswan and other ministers keep harping that muslims are as innocent and it is the hindu who is at fault. Hindus in gujarat didn't riot out of the blue but the catalyst was the Godhra massacre. Why is spin being concocted on this incident that Godhra wasn't done by muslims. Whenever I pass through any town or village - I see more muslim population. Is there any conspiracy by the Govt to hide the fact that Muslims are just 15% and not much more of the population. The way I see it while travelling through villages and towns is that Muslims could be more than 40% of the Indian population. You see it everywhere - UP,Bihar, Bengal, Meghalaya, Tripura, Assam, Tamil Nad, AP, Karnataka etc.

Lalu on Nanvati Report by sunthikar on 2008-09-26 07:46:06.576878+05:30
What sort of theory is this propounded by Mr.Lalu Prasad Yadav?. "SIMI activists are innocent" etc'. Now, Nanvati Committee is not correct, whereas his Banerjee report is correct. Is he pro-terror? Look at the incidents involving burning of trains. He does not seem to care. He has ruined Bihar, now he will do the same for India

islam and terrorism - a symibotic relationship by Grizzly Bear on 2008-09-26 07:34:09.41129+05:30
Whether Modi is guilty or not is not relevant. The very structure of ISLAM demands that non-islamic people are termed as kafirs and they don't have the same rights as muslims. So if a muslim kills a non-muslim and terms it as jihad even though it may have a criminal intent he would still be exonerated by a muslim sharia. The root cause of terrorism is this that islam gives a carte blanche to muslims to kill non-muslims and not suffer penalty.