Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Yesterday once more

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • That his surrogates, the MQM in Karachi and the PML-Q in Punjab, did indeed do so in an underhand way at times to please their master and benefactor general is another story. The MQM’s virtual sealing of Karachi on May 12, 2007 to prevent the deposed chief justice from entering the city after he had landed there, and the PML-Q’s sealing of the opposition Jamaat-i-Islami headquarters to prevent anti-Musharraf rallies in Lahore, or its crackdown on Sharif supporters to prevent them from going to Islamabad airport to receive their leader coming back from exile in September 2007, were the only occasions. However, both the MQM and the PML-Q denied that they had ordered any preventive measures to keep the people from exercising their right to protest; they sheepishly shifted the blame of such measures taken on the local police.

    This time round, Zardari cannot even hide behind any such excuse. His ministers and advisors have made no bones about having ordered a crackdown on opposition and civil society leaders to prevent them from converging on the capital to demand the restoration of the pre-November 3 judiciary, and that Zardari fulfil his other promises including restoring parliament’s sovereignty vested in it by the constitution, and which Musharraf stole by amassing all powers in the president. Many in the People’s Party itself find Zardari’s brand of politics as lacking morality and thus untenable. An old Bhutto loyalist, PPP’s Senator Raza Rabbani, resigned from the cabinet in protest a day before Zardari nominated his own loyalist and a newcomer, Farooq Naek, for the post of Senate chairman. There are expected to be more fissures of the kind within the party in the weeks ahead, as Zardari’s own trusted men replace those who enjoyed Benazir Bhutto’s confidence.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Zardari and armyBy: Mukul Dube | 13-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward "What’s to stop it from happening again to a man that neither the US nor the army has invested in for as long as they had in Musharraf?" This is semi-literate Yankese. It should be "... a man whom neither ...".
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.