Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Yesterday once more?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Having been here, there and everywhere, seen everyone, is it going to be yesterday again for Indian Muslims? Remember the era when election after election the Congress was the “natural party for governance” riding the Brahmin-Muslim-Dalit “rainbow coalition”? Recall the 1984 Lok Sabha elections when, in its most stunning nationwide performance ever, the Congress bagged 83 out of 85 seats in Uttar Pradesh. Just five years later, as Brahmins gravitated towards the BJP and Muslims towards the Samajwadi Party, “Maulana” Mulayam Singh Yadav took charge of UP in 1989. Now, 20 years of banvaas later, with the Congress in UP emerging as the biggest story of the recently concluded polls, there are clear signs of Muslim readiness to embrace the Congress again. But it’s a different India now and one thing is certain: both the Congress and Muslims will need to discover new terms of endearment, for neither tokenism nor the good old patron-client equation will work.

    Ads by Google

    Following the demolition of the Babri Masjid in December 1992 and the pogrom against Mumbai’s Muslims under Congress rule in New Delhi and in Maharashtra, Indian Muslims described the party as their “hidden enemy”. Mulayam in UP, Lalu Prasad in Bihar, the Left in West Bengal and the Telugu Desam Party in Andhra Pradesh were the Muslims’ new friends. Their estrangement from the Congress led to the first, and so far only, defeat of the party in the 1995 assembly polls in Maharashtra.

    But the experience of the last two decades has taught them that there is little to choose between the “hidden enemy” and the “new friends”. Undoubtedly, the new friends reassured insecure Muslims and proved with their riot-free regimes that communal carnages are only possible when the political bosses want them to happen. But how long can one live on gratitude alone? What about education, employment, access to credit, civic amenities? The report of the high-powered Sachar Committee (released in end-2006) was a real eye-opener for Muslims. It provided incontrovertible evidence of institutionalised and rampant discrimination against Muslims. What is worse, the report showed that on bread and butter issues the track record of the communists in West Bengal was worse than that of the Hindu communalists of Gujarat. The performance of the socialists, Lalu and Mulayam, was not much better.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Mr.By: Ghulam Muhammed | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward To: Shiney on Minority Appeasement:Why presume that PM said what he said about Muslim deserving first go at resources, for the Muslim for being Muslim and not for their being discriminated and left behind. The dread of Muslim appeasement is more in the minds of rank communalists than others who firmly adhere to constitutional position on freedom of religion, without any ifs and buts. Muslims will merge their religious identity in the mainstream, when Hindus stop their relentless campaign to foist their religious identity on a secular nation.
    APPEASEMENTBy: N.V.SANKARAN | 23-May-2009 Reply | Forward Perhaps you do not know that poverty does not discriminate people on the basis of caste or religion, unlike political parties which dole out concessions on the basis of religion. India has more poor people in the Hindu community and if an actual count is taken, the number of Hindu poor will exceed the total number of entire Muslim population of the country. Then why is the government talking only about poverty amongst Muslims only? Why don't they consider all poor people alike and work to improve their lot without any special consideration on the basis of religion? This is just appeasement for winning minority votes and that is what is called communalism, not the idea of "equality of all and appeasement of none" policy of the BJP.
    Minority AppeasementBy: shiney | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward Every commentator worth his name, has been proclaiming that this election has been about inclusiveness, rejection of identity politics etcThen why such rubbish articles on identifying with your religion? I fail to understand how any Prime Minister can say any p'lar community should have the privilege to have the first go at resources. Why are we going backwards?If Congress starts minority appeasement again, that will be the best thing to happen to BJP not to this country.I wish people keep their religious affiliations to themselves, there is no need to advertise and divide the society again. We have had enough of such nonsense.
    Yesterday once more?By: anand desai | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward please let us live based on merits, you work, you get ! you study, you get good job! but minority appeasement and free money creates a devil! the congress and any indian who wants things on a platter or free would learn it the hard way. every indian has the first right to the resources but not a particular minority etc., i tired of the congress and the way they hand out things on a platter as if this resource was theirs to hand out, please let us be equals and share this equally.
    We donot want secular democracyBy: Devendra Patel | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward Truely said in this article Congress has won because this time Muslims has voted for it because of minoirty appeasement of Congress. We Hindus are suffering from this institunalised attack by scholars, media
    Is tis man not with the CJP?By: Arvind S | 21-May-2009 Reply | Forward Are you not Sir affiliated with the Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP), which according to the SIT investigation was complicit in people filing identical (or was it cyclostyled) affidavits? I cannot understand why the IE lends it's good office to folks with such low credibility. If the Muslims (not that you can claim to speak for them) have decided never to vote BJP - the only reaction will be that the BJP will decide it will never seek the Muslim vote. That is the end of all secular moralising!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.