Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘You furnish the pictures, I’ll furnish the war’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • What is the connection between a long forgotten US naval battleship that was blown up in the Havana Harbour in 1898 and the state of the post-Mumbai television discourse? Actually, quite a lot. When the USS Maine inexplicably blew up at the height of tensions between Washington and the then Spanish colony of Cuba, the newly emerging American press barons, having just embarked on a contest for readership, as bloodthirsty as the current ratings-war between the Indian TV networks, saw a fantastic opportunity to capture paying readers by rallying them to the flag. Caught in a vicious battle for supremacy with Joseph Pulitzer’s World, William Randolph Hurst’s New York Journal immediately argued that a Spanish mine had taken down the Maine and its 262 sailors. Looking to fuel anti-Spanish hysteria, Hearst dispatched reporters to Cuba to report on alleged Spanish atrocities. When one reporter, finding no evidence, cabled back “there is no war... request to be recalled”, Hearst famously replied: “Please remain. You furnish the pictures, I’ll furnish the war.” Most historians agree that the months of holier-than-thou press jingoism that followed, finally forced the US-Spanish War that would engulf the Philippines, Puerto Rico, the Caribbean, Guam and of course, Cuba.

    The state of our satellite television market is roughly analogous to the state of the competitive press market of the 1890s-America and we are seeing a similar propensity for aggression. No longer are journalists meant to simply report facts. There is a new term in the vocabulary of television newsrooms: “aggressive” journalism. The networks, in varying degrees of complicity, are demanding action and forcing the hand of the government. This is not to argue that Pakistan’s hand was not complicit in Mumbai. The point is that any reaction, even a military one, must operate on a calibrated ladder of escalation. We need the cold calculated logic of success, not the self-defeating heat of post-traumatic anger. Remember that even in 1971, the scene of India’s greatest military victory, General Manekshaw took a whole year to prepare his Army, wisely holding up to the political desire to attack when the first flush of refugees became unbearable. Manekshaw was lucky he did not have the pressure of over fifty 24-hour networks keeping a second-to-second countdown to each of his moves. This is a serious national crisis and it demands a serious response. Instead, we are seeing even some of the most creditable networks seriously projecting the option of a first nuclear strike on Pakistan as if we were playing a game of snakes and ladders. Television is a new factor in the Indian social matrix and it demands respect, but it surely needs to grow up and be true to its own self-image, rather than behave like a petulant child.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.