Following the statement of Asif Ali Zardari, co-chairman of Pakistan People’s Party, separatists in Kashmir seem to be in a mood of serious introspection. He had said Pakistan was ready to move beyond Kashmir in its relations with India, which made the separatists’ worst fears about Islamabad’s changing political priorities come true.
The statement has framed a new existential crisis for them as Pakistan has been the lifeline for the Valley’s secessionist politics. The separatists could always bank on Islamabad for their political relevance without bothering about their own grassroots base in the state. In fact, Hurriyat moderates led by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq centered his entire politics around President Pervez Musharraf’s four-point proposals for the resolution of Kashmir. So much so that Hurriyat almost appeared as a handy instrument of Pakistan’s foreign policy, a representative of the Islamabad’s interests in the troubled state, rather than a secessionist grouping evolved from the Valley’s Azadi sentiment.
Hurriyat approach had a rationale too. A guaranteed Pakistan support not only obviated the need for relying too much on the fickle Kashmiri public support but also lent the grouping the much-needed political weight.
However, while Musharraf was generous in backing doves to the hilt, he also made them subservient to Islamabad’s fast-evolving views on the settlement of Kashmir. The hawk Geelani, who fell out with this approach, was soon cast aside and reduced to a footnote in Kashmir’s secessionist discourse.
Musharraf did not stop with Mirwaiz. He even defied the Pakistan’s policy orthodoxy on Kashmir by reaching out to the mainstream leaders like National Conference President Omar Abdullah. This was a clear gambit to rally the Kashmir’s largest mass-based party around Pakistan’s new flexible settlement options for the state. Everything was going all right if only the lawyers hadn’t queered the president’s pitch and the militants from Waziristan hadn’t unhinged the security balance in Islamabad .
... contd.