|
October
22, 2001
|
|
Towards
a Gandhian response to Osama bin Laden
|
Blind
rage won’t do
WHEN
Gandhiji was asked what he thought of western civilisation, he replied
that he thought it would be a good idea. The leader of the western
world, US President George W. Bush, tells us that his war on one
man is a global war on terrorism being fought on behalf of all of
us for Civilisation to prevail over Barbarism. Civilisation is now
pounding to smithereens the rubble that was Afghanistan.
Barbarism,
meanwhile, has fled to a cave with 300 followers - on horseback,
the only means available to barbarism to escape from Civilisation.
Civilisation has the technical means to pinpoint even a watch battery.
So Barbarism does not wear a watch: it tells the time from a sun-dial.
We have this information from the Son of Barbarism, Abdullah bin
Laden. It is a remarkable response. For it shows that barbarism
has simply to eschew the baubles of Civilisation for Civilisation
to blunder around the ring like a punch-drunk American freestyle
wrestler.
Indeed,
Barbarism needs no weapons of its own, for all it has to do is turn
the artefacts of Civilisation on Civilisation itself. After all,
it was not crazed Arabs from the Arab countries America most hates
— Iraq, Libya or Palestine — who took out the World Trade Center.
It was the work of Saudis and Egyptians, citizens in excellent standing
with the US who went to the best of Civilisation’s groves of academe
to use American airlines on American targets under the very nose
of American intelligence and security agencies who appropriate upwards
of $ 200 billion a year from the US Congress to keep Barbarism at
bay. Why are Afghan children paying with their lives for the derelictions
of the FBI and the CIA?
And
because Civilisation just does not know how to respond to a cave-man
on horse-back, it has mobilised the most massive war machine known
to human civilisation. From the Sea of Japan to the Gulf of Aqaba,
Civilisation stands at the ready: The good ship Enterprise (last
seen in the Bay of Bengal as we tried to liberate East Pakistan
from Yahya-Kissinger barbarism) stationed now in the Arabian Sea
shoots off its sea-borne air strength to pulverise every standing
building in Afghanistan. And as there are not many buildings now
left standing in Afghanistan, every cave and bunker they can find.
All to take out one man. And as he is not immediately available,
Civilisation is carpet-bombing a country it is allegedly saving
and hammering an entire people to whose rescue it has so selflessly
come. The vocabulary is spot on. This is not a massacre of innocents.
Civilisation apparently views it as ‘‘collateral damage.’’
I am
afraid Barbarism has won Round One. And Civilisation will lose the
remaining rounds unless it comes up with a more intelligent answer
than Bush has been able to provide. It is for a millennial leader
of human civilisation, like India, to come up with the answers.
For if we are a developing country, America is a developing civilisation.
They just do not have the intellectual, moral or spiritual depth
to take on the task they have appropriated for themselves.
India’s
answer to barbarism should be based on Gandhi. Tragically, it is
the cohorts of Gandhi’s assassins, the spokespersons of all that
is worst in our civilisational heritage, who today rule this country.
We have as defence minister a man let off by the courts from charges
of terrorism only because the government changed and decided not
to prosecute the terrorists behind the Baroda dynamite outrage.
We have in our external affairs minister a true representative of
a party that did not fight for our Independence - and has therefore
not even once since September 11 pronounced the words non-violence
or non-align- ment in that ghastly accent of his. And we have an
effete prime minister who is playing out from Race Course Road the
role he donned at the start of his political career when he proudly
informed the district sessions judge at Gwalior on September 1,
1942, that far from fighting the colonial power in the Quit India
Movement, ‘‘Maine kuchch nuksan nahin kiya.’
And
on the sidelines, we have the home minister of India and the chief
minister of Uttar Pradesh discovering in Bush’s war on bin Laden
the tailor-made means of reviving the flagging fortunes of the BJP
in the only state where it counts for something. So, equate the
votaries of the Babri Masjid with the Taliban ki aulad and
the Ram Mandir Abhiyan with CNN’s war on terrorism and let the BJP-RSS-Bajrang
Dal Taliban do what they are best at doing - minority bashing -
and, who knows, Lucknow might yet remain saffron.
So,
while Jaswant Singh reminds us of the values of his favourite nation,
perhaps we should be reminding his favourite nation of the values
of the Father of our Nation. Those values are summed up in words
which no patriotic Indian needs to have explained to him: truth,
non-violence, tolerance, the celebration of diversity, and above
all, secularism. There can be no ‘War on Global Terrorism’ without
a firm grounding in global secularism. The western world - and its
saffron backers - think this is irrelevant verbiage. Therefore,
western civilisation’s response to global terrorism is all about
the alarums and trumpets of war. What the world should be doing
is what Gandhi always indicated as the first line of defence; introspection,
find out what is wrong in yourself and correct yourself as the most
effective way of correcting the other. There is no introspection
in the West, no reflection on the many, many evil things they have
done which have brought this evil upon them.
There
is only blind rage and a conviction that the gadgets of war which
they have perfected will gift them the painless technological solutions
they seek to human problems. It was a response which dramatically
failed in Vietnam. It has taken America a quarter century to recover
from that licking. But like the Bourbon kings they seem not to have
learned anything, nor forgotten anything. So the same technological
answer is being sought to bin Laden in the elevating company of
Pervez Musharraf.
Someone
should loan Bush a library copy of the Gandhi Smarak Nidhi’s two-volume
publication, Non-violence in Peace and War
by one Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.
|