|
February
5, 2002
|
|
The
dilemma of being India’s Musharraf
|
All
things to all people
Musharraf
and Vajpayee are caught, each on the horns of the same dilemma:
how to kick from under them the ladder which took them to their
present eminence without themselves falling off the top rung. In
Pakistan, since at least the time of Zia-ul-Haq, the terrorists
trained for one task have found it easiest to turn their terror
on their creators. The Kalashnikov culture has converted Karachi
from the pleasant little city I once knew into the hotbed of hate
it has now become. The irony did not end with the death of Zia in
a mysterious air accident, very possibly engineered by one of the
homicidal spiritual movements he had patronised in the name of Islamisation.
Till the conclusion of the civil wars in Afghanistan, the energies
of these homegrown terrorists could be concentrated substantially
on foreign lands. But once Afghanistan was talibanised, the terrorists
had nowhere to practice their skills more expertly than in Pakistan
itself.
One
solution pursued by the ISI was to export the terrorists to Kashmir.
But not enough could get across — or be persuaded to go. With the
result that far more of their terrorists are engaged in hostilities
with the Pakistan state than with India. The immediate task for
Musharraf has been to disarm his terrorists before they get him.
It, therefore, did not surprise me that Musharraf was only minutes
behind Jaswant Singh in declaring his undying loyalty to the American
cause. For the war on Osama gave him the cutting edge over his own
terrorists. Thus American pressure on Musharraf to show himself
the Ataturk of 21st century Pakistan was exactly what Musharraf
needed to fulfill the priority item on his own agenda since the
coup of October 1999, while winning from the Americans, for himself
and his country, some hugely remunerative brownie points.
|
|
Islamic terrorists see Musharraf as the
main hurdle in their path, just as the VHP and its myriad
sympathisers see Vajpayee as the main hurdle in their path
|
|
Musharraf’s
problem is that he has to defang Islamic terrorism while avowing
the very objectives for which such terrorism exists in the first
place. To laud what the terrorists seek to secure while depriving
them of the means they use to do so is the circle he has to square.
Vajpayee’s dilemma is no different. He is of the RSS, shares their
assumptions, is at one with them in their goals, depends on them
for ideological inspiration as much as for political achievement,
and has no differences with them over the ultimate aim — which is
the establishment of a Hindu Rashtra.
It
was his comrade-in-arms for the last five decades, Lal Krishna Advani,
who converted the minor movement over Ayodhya into a nation-wide
crusade against Islam. Vajpayee was not a step behind any knickerwallah
in treating Ram Bhakti as the litmus test of patriotism. His doubts
were about the effectiveness of the means employed by Advani to
advance their common goal. It was an argument over tactics, not
over objectives. As a practicing RSS acolyte, Vajpayee wants the
Ram Mandir as avidly as any Bajrang Dali.
As
prime minister of a shaky coalition, however, he knows that it is
either Ram or his gaddi. So, he says one thing today and quite another
tomorrow. He wants to be all things to all men: sweetly reasonable
to the secular middle-class, dedicatedly Hindu nationalist to his
own kind. Ideally, he would like the sants and sadhus to endorse
him. Not taken in, they want him to endorse them. Nothing would
please him more than a smile from Acharya Giriraj Kishore. But to
induce a smile out of the Acharya, Vajpayee would have to kiss goodbye
to Race Course Road. So he draws what comfort he can from the Vishwa
Hindu Parishad saying one day they have no desire to see the last
of the Vajpayee government and just 24 hours later insisting that
it is all one to them whether Vajapyee stays or goes, they must
have their mandir come March 12, hell, heaven or high water. And
so keen is their appetite for confrontation that their abuse of
Vajpayee from their platform makes this column sound like a paean
of praise in his honour.
Musharraf
and Vajpayee are existential victims of the same dilemma. Both need
to repudiate their respective constituencies to pursue their other
objectives and remain in power. Their constituencies, however, are
loathe to accept that their role is to serve the master’s purpose
only to be discarded when they no longer serve that purpose. Their
dedication to their narrow goals is just as deep-rooted, possibly
more, than the mukhautas they have thus far worn. So, the internecine
struggle assumes complementary dimensions: the Islamic terrorists
see Musharraf as the main hurdle in their path, just as the Vishwa
Hindu Parishad and its myriad sympathisers across the spectrum of
the sangh parivar, including the BJP, see Vajpayee as the main hurdle
in their path.
Therefore,
every rejection by Musharraf or Vajpayee of the fanatics they have
nurtured is followed quickly by sops to prevent themselves becoming
victims of their own creation. Musharraf has the better chance of
surviving politically because he runs an efficient, imaginative
and supple dictatorship, but a worse chance of surviving physically
because the weapons he has supplied the terrorists are quite as
effective as the big stick he carries himself.
Vajpayee
can keep the VHP dangling so long as the numbers on his side in
the ranks of BJP MPs remain larger rather than smaller. At the same
time, he has to keep the most marginal of his NDA partners satisfied
that he is not reverting on Ayodhya from the NDA agenda to the BJP
back-burner. To this end, he has tasked the most discredited member
of his government, George Fernandes, who is as reviled outside the
NDA as he is adored within, to keep the partners on leash, while
the RSS boss-men keep the BJP treasury benches whipped into line.
However, the NDA partners are such an opportunistic lot that it
is not Vajpayee’s fate but their estimation of their own which will
determine whether they follow George or abandon him. As for the
BJP MPs, so long as Vajpayee looks like he will survive, they will
be there — albeit without enthusiasm, but if Advani decides that
this is the moment of his tryst with destiny, the BJP will split
down the middle and the nation will find itself back at the hustings.
The struggle is between the True Believers and the Faint Believers.
The jehad against the kafirs within the sangh parivar is gaining
momentum. It has penetrated the restive ranks of the BJP. I think
it would be prudent to begin preliminary preparations for the 14th
Lok Sabha elections.
|