|
June
20, 2001
|
|
Examination
system goes wrong and children pay the price
|
CBSEs
horror story
Hundreds,
possibly thousands, of families in Delhi go into deep mourning at
this time every year. It is almost like a death in the family. The
whole household treads on eggshells for fear of upsetting the grieving
victim who goes into isolation, weeping inconsolably. Relatives
and friends are sternly warned to avoid the query, So
what were your marks in the boards?
All
exams throw up a few sore losers, but the Central Board of Secondary
Education has an inordinately high percentage of those who feel
cheated. As a parent I have for years been hearing horror stories
about board goof-ups. There was a foreign secretarys son who
got, if my memory serves me right, 39 in Maths; it was reversed
to 93 within an hour when his mother, a member of the CBSE board,
raised a hue and cry. This year a colleague found that her daughter
had been marked absent for a Political Science paper which she had
appeared for. The mistake was rectified the same day. But the less
well connected have to wait for weeks, often well after the college
admissions are over, to find out if there was a totaling error of
any sort. Every year less than two per cent of some 25,000 applications
for re-totaling of marks get any relief.
The
problem is not so much clerical errors as careless assessment of
transcripts. But the board steadfastly refuses to re-evaluate an
answer paper or even to physically produce a marksheet to clear
up apprehensions about interchanging of marks. Unfortunately, the
courts have upheld the CBSEs stand, thus shutting out all
accountability and transparency in this lop-sided examination system.
This
year a young girl from Bal Bharati Air Force school who had been
consistently scoring between 85 and 90 per cent throughout her school
career, including her 10th board examination, obtained only 68 per
cent in the 12th board. There is no way this obvious error can be
rectified. Last year, 13 children who passed the highly competitive
entrance examination to the Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs)
were denied admission since they got less than 60 per cent in the
CBSE board, a percentage which even very mediocre students easily
achieve. Five years ago, a girl who had won national awards for
her writing skills, failed to reach the minimum qualifying mark
in English in the CBSE for her to get admission in a BA Honours
course in English. (Incidentally I notice that over a dozen Delhi
colleges are conducting their own tests in English this year for
admission, suggesting they too are disillusioned with the CBSEs
marking methods!)
An
education ministry official, perturbed by his sons poor marks
in Political Science requested someone in the board to check out
informally what had gone wrong. It turned out that the examiner
had simply given one mark for each two-marks question even though
the boy had made all the necessary points.
When
I met the chairman of the CBSE, Ashok Ganguly, he candidly admitted
that evaluations in the CBSE have a variation range of five to seven
per cent, since the board has to handle huge numbers. In the 12th
board, for instance, there are around 40 lakh transcripts and 10,500
evaluators.
The Delhi region, which accounts for more than one third of the
nearly three lakh children who sit for the 12th board, Ganguly noted
ruefully, has by far the largest number of complaints. He attributed
this to the high expectations of the parents and the mad craze for
marks in the Capital. Heavens wont fall if a child
does not get into college rated A as against one rated B. All colleges
should be equal, is his view.
In
fact this attempt to equalise education has brought
the CBSE to its present sorry pass. Formerly, Delhi had two separate
school leaving exams, the Delhi board for pupils from the Delhi
government schools and the CBSE for the private and public schools.
At the risk of sounding elitist, the merger has harmed both educational
streams. The children from the Delhi government schools are unable
to cope with the high standard of the CBSE and are demoralised by
the high failure rate. On the other hand, 70 per cent of the evaluators
in the Delhi CBSE board are from government schools, partly because
private school teachers shirk the responsibility of board correction.
The government school teachers have a different style of assessment
and terms of reference from the private schools.
The
meagre payment of Rs 6.50 per transcript is scant incentive to be
a CBSE evaluator. And it is unpardonable that only around 12 per
cent of the modest Rs 300 examination fee per student is spent on
the actual correction work. A suggestion that perhaps the examination
fee could be enhanced to ensure quality assessment was brushed aside
as unthinkable by Ganguly, though my experience is that the poor
seldom grudge money spent on education. In any case the CBSE could
always introduce separate charges for government and private schools.
If
I write with some degree of indignation about the CBSE it is partly
because of my own personal experience. Some years ago I met the
former chairman of the CBSE B.P. Khandelwal in the context of a
re-check for my younger daughters CBSE marks. I did not identify
myself as a journalist for fear it would harm the case. Khandelwals
advice was that one must adopt a philosophical attitude towards
mark assessments. He pointed out that even the great poet Harivansh
Rai Bachchan, Amitabh Bachchans father, was not awarded a
first class in English by Allahabad University in his MA. Which
is cold comfort to children who are vying for college admissions
in a competitive environment where some kids are known to scores
as high as 98 in English.
Khandelwal
threw the carrot that I could in strictest confidence possibly be
shown the marksheets to set my doubts at rest. But nothing of the
kind ever happened. After numerous telephonic reminders over a fortnight
I was finally informed verbally by the controller of examinations
that the marking of my daughters answer sheets was no doubt
strict but there was no error in totaling. After I blew my cover
and threatened to seek H.D. Shouries help in filing a PIL
to force the CBSE to produce the actual transcripts, all communication
with the board ceased. Fortunately my daughter just made it to the
cut-off in the college of her choice. But my heart goes out to all
those kids who are penalised for no fault of their own. Is it necessary
for our children to be disillusioned by the system at such an early
age?
|