|
September
22, 2000
|
|
Between
the devout and God
|
The
bells of Guruvayoor
It
is strange that the Marxists who rule the state have not said a
word against the priest and his benefactors in the Devaswom Board
The
other day Justice K.T. Thomas of the Supreme Court told me how a
few years ago when he was a judge of the Kerala High Court, he and
his wife were profusely welcomed into the Kashi Vishwanath temple
by the head priest, who knew they were Syrian Christians. But in
his home state, the head priest of the famous Sri Krishna temple
at Guruvayoor deemed it necessary to order punyaham a ritual
cleansing after Vayalar Ravis son accompanied by his
newly-wedded wife had polluted the shrine by his entry
there. And to rub salt into the wound, the brides parents
were bluffed into paying for the punyaham. It reminded me of Kameshwar
Jha, who after taking over as principal of C.M. College, Darbhanga,
from his predecessor who belonged to a Dalit community, purified
the chair with the sacred Ganga water in 1997.
The
head priest of the temple justified his action on the ground that
the Hinduness of the bridegroom was not certain as his mother Mercy
Ravi was a Christian. Only a small section of the Ezhavas, the preponderant
caste of Kerala to which Ravi, one of the tallest Congress leaders,
belongs, follows the matrilineal system. Even if Ravi belongs to
this minuscule group, the Hinduness of his son is unquestionable
when the latter declares himself as a Hindu. The very fact that
he had his wedding at Guruvayoor and had sought the blessing of
Guruvayoorappan, as the deity is reverentially known in the state,
should have settled the question once and for all.
Far
from asserting this unassailable position, Ravi has tried to prove
the Hinduness of his son by referring to his educational records
and his membership of the Sri Narayana Dharma Paripalana (SNDP)
yogam. Needless to say, the abode of God is for the devout and any
discrimination on grounds of caste or accidents of birth is unconstitutional
and, therefore, unacceptable. Far more reprehensible is the argument
of the Devaswom Board that in matters of faith the head priests
is the last word. In other words, the Board justifies punyaham.
It is strange that the Marxists who rule the state have not said
a word against the priest and his benefactors in the Board, which
when constituted for the first time in the fifties had R. Shankar,
an Ezhava who later became chief minister, as a member.
At
least in the past that is not how the progressive state reacted
to obscurantism. In the thirties when the Ezhavas, inspired by Sri
Narayana Guru, whose revolutionary social and religious teachings
should have put him on a par with Lord Buddha and Guru Nanak but
for the caste factor, sought entry into temples, the predecessors
of the present head priest had opined that there was no need for
such entry. But did that prevent Sri Chitra Thirunal Bala Rama Verma,
the Maharajah of Travancore, to issue the famous Temple Entry Proclamation
in 1936, which was a precursor of similar enactments in the rest
of the country? Of course, one cannot easily forget that for more
than a decade after the proclamation, the obscurantist priests of
Guruvayoor managed to prevent Dalits from worshipping in the famous
temple. That is what happens when matters of faith are left to the
priestly class to decide.
If
Ravis reaction is anything to go by, he believes that it was
his Ezhava background that prompted the head priest to order punyaham.
While it is regrettable that Ravis son had an ignominious
return from the temple because of his mothers Christian birth,
I do not know whether he is aware that it was Christianity which,
in a way, allowed him to enter the temple. When in 1891 a Malayali
Memorial signed by more than 10,000 representative Travancoreans
was submitted to the government praying for the recognition of the
right of the Ezhavas to enter the government service, the upper
caste Hindus of the state prevailed upon the Maharajah not to concede
the prayer. The memorialists sought only privileges that were already
enjoyed by the Christians and the Muslims. P. Chidambaram Pillai
in Right of Temple Entry says, The Thiyya (Ezhava) Hindu of
Hindu Travancore has not as much right of free citizenship as the
lowest Hindu in the Mohammadan state of Hyderabad or the lowest
Hindu of Christian British India. To be a Hindu in the Hindu state
of Travancore is not a privilege for the non-caste Hindus; it is
not a mere handicap; it is a curse; it is an insult.
In
dejection many of the Ezhavas embraced Christianity as borne out
by the fact that the Christian population of Travancore which stood
at six lakhs in 1901 increased to 17 lakhs in 1931. And when their
fight for equity was not taking the Ezhavas anywhere, their leadership
threatened that they would convert en masse, rather than stay as
helots of Hindu society. The alert Diwan, Sir C.P. Ramaswamy Iyer,
realised the imminent danger and prompted the Maharajah to issue
the proclamation. Otherwise, the history of Kerala would have been
quite different. Whereas the Maharajah should have been eulogised
for his brave action, the upper caste Hindus saw it as a betrayal.
It was the sanatanis, as they were called, who tried
to obstruct Mahatma Gandhi when he visited Kerala as part of his
campaign for Harijan welfare.
Those
in authority who claim that the head priest of Guruvayoor has the
last word on temple rites should bear in mind the heavy price Maharajah
Marthanda Varma, who ruled Travancore from 1729 for about 30 years
and who is known as the maker of modern Travancore, had to pay for
paying heed to such advice. He had an able Brahmin diwan, Ramayyan
Dalawa, who had little difficulty in having the Maharajah, whose
name was, otherwise, a terror to his enemies, abjectly submit to
Brahmin domination. He took three steps by which the whole state
was surrendered, bound hand and foot, to the Brahmin. The first
was the surrender of the whole country to Sree Padmanabha, the deity
in Thiruvananthapuram, by which the ruler assumed the role of the
vassal of that deity.
The
second and third steps were the setting up of oottupuras or feeding
houses for the Brahmins throughout the state and the institution
of murajapam. The latter was instituted once in six years for feeding
Brahmins at a fabulous cost. This was supposed to remove the sins
of the ruler for burning down temples during the wars he waged.
It was just an excuse to be fed at state expense. So costly was
the feeding enterprise that Marthand Vermas successor had
no money to discharge his obligations to the British government
and had to take a loan from the Thiruvananthapuram temple to be
repaid with 50 per cent interest!
One
really wonders whether the punyaham would have been ordered but
for the encouragement the priestly class gets from such abject surrender
as in Uttar Pradesh where the Ram Prakash Gupta government repealed
the 1962 Hindu Public Religious Places Act whereby the sants and
sadhus will have a free rein and the state will remain a mute spectator.
If this dangerous tendency is not put in check, it will be back
to the days of Manu when the people were nothing, the prince
was little and the priest was everything.
|