|
October
17, 2001
|
|
WIDE
ANGLE
|
Look
beyond Wagah and UP
We
have more Muslims than Pakistan, sell this to Powell
YOU
cannot play with fire and not be burnt’’ my Iranian hostess, a professor,
asserted in response to the general conversation on India’s aversion
to third party interest on the Kashmir issue. ‘‘You want America
to help you take out the terrorist bases in Pakistan but then you
put up your hands: ‘‘the rest of the mess we shall manage ourselves’’.
‘‘Look,
this is phase two of the operation against terror: and it started
with the British Foreign Secretary’s visit to Tehran. How swiftly
the British establishment has followed up; Blair and Arafat have
already announced a Palestinian state. Why are you so coy on Kashmir?’’
I
expected our Iranian hostess to cancel the dinner because I thought
Tehran would be tense after the US strikes against Afghanistan.
I was mistaken. Not only were the streets chaotic with traffic pulsating
with life, but the hostess was the very picture of unruffled grace,
arranging flowers and large fruit bowls on the side tables next
to every guest.‘‘We have seen this before, she said in a matter
of fact way.’’ But the poor ruined people of Afghanistan did not
deserve this. She continued her soliloquy. ‘‘The Taliban were blackening
the name of Islam — they should have been removed, but why hit the
poor people?’’
|
|
There
is a catch for India with regard to the gas pipeline. Britain
includes Iran, the US excludes it. But passage through Pakistan
is central to both
|
|
Although
Iranians are as disgusted with the Taliban as us, yet they have
a more enduring sense of history. British Foreign Secretary, Jack
Straw learnt this lesson during his visit to Tehran before the airstrikes.
They never tire of reminding us that both, the Taliban and Osama
bin Laden, were creations of the CIA and ISI. The continuing murder
of Shias in Pakistani mosques at the hands of groups like Sipah-e-Sahaba,
has distanced then from Pakistan. They relate to India on a civilisational
basis.
‘‘This
is the time we should have clasped each other’s hands’’ a senior
Iranian cleric told me. ‘‘We have the same interests-to remove the
Taliban and have a broadbased representative government in Afghanistan.’’
He continued, ‘‘The extent to which the West shares this interest
is to our advantage — but let us not rely too much on the West.
Their interests may change. We shall always be in the region and
we shall always have the same interests.’’ Iran’s suffering on account
of the situation in Afghanistan is on many counts: 4,000 Iranian
law enforcement officers have been murdered by Afghan drug smugglers.
Over two million refugees are an economic burden as well as a security
threat with heaven knows how many Taliban having slipped in and
scattered across the country. A further influx would be catastrophic.
Once
the dust settles on the Afghan situation, divergences would surface
even between Britain and the US. This would be the wrong time for
Jack Straw to admit to these future conflicts of interest. But his
Iranian interlocutors are convinced. For instance, British gas is
already involved in the setting up of liquefied gas plants at the
Assaluyeh hub as an interim measure for finding outlets for the
world’s second largest oil deposits. Along with India, Britain is
also interested in the gas pipeline project, both over land across
Quetta in Pakistan and underwater directly from Iran to the Gujarat
coast. Both, Iran and the Western hydrocarbon interests are fairly
vocal that the underwater feasibility study is being undertaken
simply to keep India humoured ‘because in reality the underwater
project is far too expensive to be feasible. In other words part
of the peace dividend from the ‘‘strike against terror’’ will be
the flow of gas, critical to which is the Indo-Pak ‘‘patch up’’
on Kashmir.
Influenced
by the Israeli lobby, the US would like to leave Iran out of the
pipeline dividend. It would like to have a stable dispensation in
Afghanistan. Turkmenistan and other central Asian republics can
then access South Asia through Afghanistan.
There
is a catch for India in both the scenarios. Britain includes Iran,
the US excludes it. But passage through Pakistan is central to both.
Does it mean that the strategic value of Pakistan remains beyond
its current utility for logistics and intelligence during the Afghan
airstrikes?
The
unreported success of Jack Straw’s visit was that he was able to
obtain Iran’s neutrality in the current conflict without the country
ostensibly having to resile from its stated anti-Western, particularly
anti-American positions. President Khatami has indicated a desire
to mend fences with the US but the Iranian establishment would like
to extract a political price.
Iran
values greatly the considerable constituency it has nurtured in
the Arab street by simple opposition to the mid-East peace process
in which the Arab dictators and kings have acquiesced. The manner,
in which Ariel Sharon has knocked the stuffing out of the peace
process, make the Iranian leadership feel vindicated. They would
now like to be seen to have had a role in putting together bits
of the peace process with their own garnishing on the final status
of Jerusalem and the question of Palestinian refugees. This, at
the moment, is a non starter. All sides are privately aware of this.
But the British Foreign Secretary did make an admirable bid to bring
Tehran into positive spotlight by travelling directly to Jerusalem
after meeting with Khatami.
For
Americans the action in Afghanistan is only the first phase. The
next few phases could go into the next several years. Britain is
at the heart of the alliance led by the US. If Straw can publicly
spell out the causes of terrorism in the Middle East, neither Kashmir
nor Chechnya, Kosovo, Bosnia, Northern Ireland, Sri Lanka, Columbia,
Philippines are likely to escape scrutiny of an increasingly obtrusive
world community. Frankly, the terrorist camps in Pakistan will be
taken out. We now have to address the important task of winning
the hearts and minds of the Kashmiri people - now, before an intrusive
world points fingers at our poor record.
The
time is to look beyond the Wagah border, rise above petty communalism
and the compulsions of the forthcoming UP elections even as the
larger stakes of the nation are undermined. The nation will survive
without the BJP in UP but it’s path will become perilous with 150
million Muslims nursing an unspeakable grievance.
The
Iranians are discreet diplomats and will not have raised the question
of Hindu-Muslim tension building up in India, however much they
may be sensitive to them. But he and the Iranian establishment is
aware of the Indian mantra on Kashmir, one that should also be read
out to Secretary of State Colin Powell; what is the mantra? ‘Indian
secularism protects among a billion others, the world’s second largest
Muslim population, greater than the population of Pakistan and any
issue, including Kashmir must be addressed, keeping this in mind.
|