|
January
4, 2000
|
|
Surely
there's life beyond Bofors
|
Sonia's
somnambulism
Being
the leader of the Opposition entails more than opposition for oppositions
sake; the occupant of the post would do well to display maturity
A new
year is traditionally the time to make new resolutions. Here is
mine: do not take Sonia Gandhis promises at face value!
A fortnight
ago, I wrote in this column that I saw some faint hopes that Indias
leaders had learned to stand together in the interests of the nations.
Let me admit it right away: I goofed. As I write, we are plunged,
literally and metaphorically, back into the darkness.
Union
Power Minister Suresh Prabhu put the finger for Delhi blacking out
on a bus fault at the Panki sub-station
in Uttar Pradesh. It seems funny to think that something so far
off could plunge even the prime ministers residence into darkness.
Not so weird, however, when we realise that events shaping up in
Malaysia could affect the lives of thousands in Manipur.
To
recap: The situation in Manipur is bad and getting worse. Ministers
are alleged to be hand in glove with militants, the bureaucracy
has been cowed into obedience, and ordinary citizens find there
is no government worth the name. But Presidents Rule is not
an option unless the Congress (I) is prepared to back the Vajpayee
ministry. (The National Democratic Alliance lacks a majority in
the Rajya Sabha, which must ratify any such measure.)
Sonia
Gandhi does not deny the gravity of the situation in Manipur. But
she cannot bring herself to support the government either. On December
21, when the prime minister and the home minister spoke with the
Congress boss, she hemmed and hawed over the issue. When asked,
bluntly, about her stance, she responded by asking for an all-party
meeting.
This
is a measure to gain time and nothing more. If the Congress (I)
wants to discuss anything then Parliament is as good a forum as
any. In any case, what exactly is an all-party meet expected to
achieve if the largest party in the Opposition does not have anything
worthwhile to say? If the Congress (I) backs the National Democratic
Alliance in the Rajya Sabha it does not matter if the other smaller
parties oppose the government; conversely, it is impossible to use
Article 356 in the teeth of Congress opposition. That, in essence,
was the point made by the home minister to Sonia Gandhi.
The
president of the Congress (I) did not deny the truth of these assertions.
Failing an all-party meeting, she could only state that she would
have to consult her colleagues in her own party. Close to two weeks
later there is no further response from Sonia Gandhi; the consultations
are presumably still in progress.
Actually,
this might be a first flash of an undisclosed phenomenon? Sonia
Gandhi possessing a sense of humour. It is a joke to think that
a Congressman would find the guts to oppose a party president belonging
to the Nehru-Gandhi clan. And who would La Gandhi consult even if
she were seriously inclined to do so? The Congress Working Committee
presumably, but in state after state Congress committees have begged
her to forget about elections and just nominate all the members
herself. Must a puppeteer consult her dolls?
But
let us push aside this farce and see what is really going on. Up
to December 20, Sonia Gandhi was willing to support the Vajpayee
administration if it chose to ask for Presidents Rule in Manipur.
What led to the leader of the Opposition to changeb her stance when
the prime minister and the home minister spoke with her on December
21?
The
only event of note that took place was that Ottavio Quattrocchi
was arrested in distant Malaysia on December 20. This happened as
the result of a long-standing agreement between India, Malaysia,
and Interpol. Is that what led to the chronically suspicious Congress
boss withdrawing into her shell?
I do not know. What I do know is that Sonia Gandhi seemed to be
unusually perturbed in the last weeks of the old millennium. On
one occasion, she even forgot to stand when the national anthem
was being played. And then there was her breach of parliamentary
tradition when she made a blatantly political speech on the last
day of the Winter Session.
(Even
the leaders of the Samajwadi Party took her to task for her bad
manners on the occasion; having deputed Jaipal Reddy to speak in
the Ayodhya debate, one wondered, why she waited so long to unsheathe
her claws?)
Not
so incidentally, the Italian businessman made a significant statement
when the Malaysian authorities laid hands on him. He was, he claimed,
being persecuted only because of his friendship with Rajiv and Sonia
Gandhi. Was this an implicit threat? Or perhaps a reminder to someone
that friendship means knowing some secrets?
At
this point, I really do not want to get into reciting the saga of
Bofors. But let me recap the facts. First, there is a dangerous
situation in Manipur. Second, Sonia Gandhi knows the facts. Third,
she is not prepared to openly back the Government of India on a
matter of national security.
The
post of leader of the Opposition is an important one. The man or
woman who holds the office is under the spotlight, allowing the
people of India to judge if he or she has what it takes to be prime
minister. The job entails more than opposition for oppositions
sake; the occupant would do well to display maturity and bipartisanship.
The
problem is that Sonia Gandhi today is offering neither opposition
nor a friendly hand. She is mired in a sterile, stubborn, suspicious,
uncooperative mood, scared to take any decision.
Manipur
is a test case of sorts. There are other problems looming ahead,
some where the smaller parties might voice an opinion. (There are
not too many of them interested in distant Manipur.) Is, for instance,
Sonia Gandhi prepared to stand up and be counted if the Womens
Reservation Bill comes up for voting? Or is the Congress (I)s
support for the measure so much hot air? What if the time comes
for the Government of India to take some stern measures against
the ISI? Will Sonia Gandhi again seek refuge in confusion and silence?
There
is a life for both the Congress (I) and its dithering Supreme Leader
beyond Bofors and beyond Quattrocchi. But what will it take to convince
Sonia Gandhi of that?
|