|
Attack
in Mumbai and New York
Sir:
In Mandavi Mehta’s ‘‘Quick ’n’ macho solutions won’t do’’
it was described how a group of Indian Americans had issued
an e-mail with the ‘‘gleeful subtext’’ that Pakistan had fallen
out of favour and it was time for India to capitalize on this.
I am a New Yorker, and I lost touch with a family member in
the city for several hours on the day of the attacks. It was
not a ‘‘gleeful’’ time for me. I was also one of those involved
in drafting the e-mail you write of. While my reaction to
Tuesday’s events was not one of “glee”, it is certainly one
of vindication for India’s stand.
I
have lived in two of the world’s largest metropoles - Mumbai
and New York - at a time when each faced the most horrendous
terrorist attack in its history. I am utterly convinced that
the Pakistani government, Inter Services Intelligence and
terrorist cells were intimately involved in planning and executing
both of them. I believe it is the responsibility of every
Indian to expose the nature of that involvement before the
rest of the world. If we do not, Pakistani terrorism in India
will certainly continue unabated.
—
KARTIK MOHAN
New York
Need to educate
Sir:
I certainly would not describe Sunil Jain’s expectations in
‘‘Brothers against Islamic Terror’’ (September 15) as completely
rational. Voting a party into power does not mean a job done
for the citizens of the land. All the citizens of India know
that the economic crisis has occurred because a) Most Indian
citizens do not pay their taxes, very few people are honest
about this; b) The average Indian citizen promotes corruption
and cheats the country; c) Truth and justice do not mean a
lot to people who have to walk 30 kms to get muddy and infected
water for drinking and washing.
Agreed,
that the politicians are not doing their job well. But then
look at the people they are governing. A corrupt and an immoral
society will always vote for a corrupt and immoral government.
The “pledge” that we read in school books is just another
“thing” on one of the pages of the books that is to be ignored
because it does not get you marks! This is democracy. We need
to educate the people of India. Unless this is done, we are
in deep trouble. We have to help ourselves with or without
the government.
—
ANIRUDDHA PHATAK
On e-mail
Rise
in racism
Sir:
I read Shekhar Gupta’s article ‘‘Television Tutorial’’ (September
15) with great interest. In fact, having been in the US for
past many years and in India for three years during which
the hijacking incident took place, I feel I can offer a slightly
different perspective. Most Americans have expressed a strong
and immediate sentiment to bomb some country in a big way.
Also, being an Indian, I have felt the sudden change in the
way mutual glances have changed hue and an increase in ugly
incidents of racial discrimination and hate crime of late.
As is widely known, American media is usually self-centric
and the public fairly uneducated about cultural nuances around
the globe. How else then is one to justify the murder of a
Sikh in Arizona primarily for his turban.
As
for Intelligence failures, there has been a lot of talk and
analysis and there have been calls for CIA Director George
Tenet’s resignation. Alas, the intelligence community has
squarely laid the blame for this incident on their reduced
powers after the Rockfeller Commission recommendations in
the 60’s.
—
ATUL ARORA
On e-mail
Sir: The reason that the US population an politicians don’t
create a shrill response, as Shekhar Gupta argued in ‘‘Television
Tutorial’’, because the justice system is very efficient in
the US. The people have confidence in it. Note the statement
of the US leaders: we would bring those people to justice.
But in India, the justice system is almost non-existent. There
is no one prosecuted nor punishments are strong. For example,
in India, you can kill 100 people and IF you are caught, you
will just get life imprisonment (that would take 20 years
to decide). Unless the Indian justice system and laws become
as efficient as the US, no one is going to have confidence.
—
DEEPAK DATTA
On e-mail
|