




According to the last update, the reconciled version had gone for the final clearance of the House Rules Committee. Sources said there has been re-organisation of content in the two Bills so that most of India’s concerns are now non-binding with several of the reporting requirements now clubbed under a couple of “manageable provisions.”
It’s learnt that the Senate’s insistence for “annual certification” by the US Administration that India is complying with all the conditions may be refined to a general reporting requirement that the US Government does in the case of several other laws.
On the Iran nuclear issue, however, the House of Representatives, at the instance of Tom Lantos, agreed by voice vote that the House version of the Bill must defer to the language used by the Senate.
This could have constrained the conferees from making any major changes to the Senate language that asks the US Administration to ensure that India continues its support on the Iran nuclear issue consistent with the United Nations resolutions.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, as reported in The Indian Express, had suggested the opposite: that the Senate defer to the House version. However, last-minute lobbying, sources said, is still under way.
Besides this, qualifications could be added in provisions requiring Washington to lobby with other countries in case there is violation of NSG and MTCR guidelines.
What is expected to be clarified is that such drastic steps cannot be automatically triggered without checking the intent of the Indian government.
Largely, it is believed that there have not been many deletions but a lot of effort has gone into refining the language and organising the various clauses of this Bill.
... contd.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications