Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Indian Express >  Front Page >  Indo-US N-Deal > 
Font Size

Scientists opposed to deal forget no reaching power target without it

Print Email Feedback Discuss
Rate Article
Rating:  
Pranab Dhal Samanta Posted: Dec 18, 2006 at 0258 hrs IST
NEW DELHI, DECEMBER 17 Retired scientists have again planted the red flag on the Indo-US nuclear deal, rejecting the Bill in its current shape. But in doing so, they have overlooked an important fact that the Department of Atomic Energy, in its vision document, has set a target of generating 20,000 MW power by 2020. Of this, the DAE envisages 8,000 MW to be produced by six light water reactors imported from other countries.

This import is impossible without the nuclear deal (the Bill is to be signed tomorrow by US President George W Bush). Perhaps, that is the reason why the DAE is more cautious in its response and is inclined to wait until the final 123 agreement is negotiated. However, former DAE heads are willing to go to the extent of taking a relook at these targets as the Bill passed by the US Congress is unacceptable to them.

‘‘We are disappointed by the end product which is different from what was agreed on July 18. If the end product remains the same, then the deal is unacceptable to us. It is a natural corollary that DAE will then have to revise its targets,’’ former DAE head M S Srinivasan, who opposed the Bill in its final shape, told The Indian Express.

It is important to note here that these targets were set well before the deal was firmed up. ‘‘We are going in for import of light water technology as an external additionality in order to accelerate our nuclear power programme. This, however, requires overcoming certain constraints imposed by international politics. Any reasonable world order can only expect countries to fulfill their international safeguards commitments and no more than that,’’ says the DAE vision document.

Ads By Google

Related Stories:

The n-deal is not only crucial to importing reactors, but also to meet the shortfall in uranium. This point was elucidated clearly by another former head of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board A Gopalakrishnan who is now in the forefront of opposing the n-deal.

‘‘Indian natural uranium ores are very low in grade, mainly because the uranium produced in India is roughly six to seven times as costly compared to its price in international market. But currently India is banned from purchasing natural uranium from the international market because of NSG restrictions. Perhaps, the only roadblock in moving aggressively forward with the indigenous nuclear power programme envisioned by Bhabha is this inability to increase uranium supply,’’...

Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient's name *
*Recipient's e-mail address *
(multiple addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name's and e-mail address'es you provide will not
be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient's of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close