




Upholding the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) order, a bench headed by Justice S H Kapadia said MSAS was not a permanent establishment (PE) as it was performing only back office operations in India and cannot be taxed under PE rules.
The bench also partly allowed the appeals of both income tax department and investment banking firm Morgan Stanley.
“There was no agency PE as the PE in India had no authority to enter into or conclude the contracts. The contracts would be entered in the US. The implementation of those contracts only to the extent of back office functions would be carried out in India,” the apex court ruling said.
However, the court held that Morgan Stanley Advantage Services would be a service PE in India under Article 5(2)(1) of the India-US Tax Treaty on account of the services to be performed by officials deputed by Morgan Stanley and not on account of stewardship activities.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications