Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Newsletter | ePaper
Indian Express >  Op-Ed > 
Font Size

Model USA

Print Email Feedback Discuss
Rate Article
Rating:  
Los Angles Times Posted: Jul 12, 2007 at 2326 hrs IST
On July 3, Gordon Brown made one of the most startling statements ever made by a newly installed premier before the House of Commons. Unless my ears mistook me, Brown pledged to transform the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland into the United States of Britain.

Opinion polls like the Pew Global Attitudes survey continue to testify to widespread anti-American feeling among British voters. Brown himself has hinted that he will pursue a less slavishly pro-American foreign policy than his predecessor, Tony Blair. Yet the “new British constitutional settlement” Brown promised last week owes an unmistakable debt to the American system.

“For centuries,” declared Brown, the prime minister and the executive branch “have exercised authority in the name of the monarchy without the people and their elected representatives being consulted.” His aim, by contrast, is to “entrust more power to parliament and the British people.” Nota bene: from royal authority to “We, the people.”

Brown offered to delegate the power to declare war to the House of Commons, albeit on the basis of a resolution rather than a statute. Again, this imitates the US, where (under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution) Congress alone has the power to declare war.

Ads By Google

Related Stories:

The Government is to publish, on a regular basis, a national security strategy. Another import: President Bush has published two such documents since 2001.

There is to be a British national security council. The American model for this dates to 1947.

The House of Lords is almost certainly to become an elected body. Hey, Gordon, how about renaming it “the Senate”? Above all, Brown proposes to “codify — both the duties and rights of citizens and the balance of power between government, parliament and the people.”

In concluding his statement, he explicitly raised the possibility of a Bill of Rights and a written constitution.

Wow. It’s taken more than 200 years, but a British prime minister has accepted that Hamilton, Jefferson, Madison and Washington were right.

Now, I agree that there are some superficially plausible arguments for an Americanisation of the British system of government. Under Brown’s predecessor, there is no doubt that the power of the executive relative to Parliament grew intolerably and was systematically abused by the prime minister and his cronies. However, there are more compelling arguments against the creation of a United States of Britain.

The most important of these is that, whatever it says on paper,...

Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views represented here are not endorsed by www.indianexpress.com. The person writing and submitting the comment is / are responsible for the content of comment. The comment should not have inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication. There will be time lag between the submission and publication of the comments. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient's name *
*Recipient's e-mail address *
(multiple addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name's and e-mail address'es you provide will not
be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient's of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close