The Congress and she

As a woman you ought to be very happy over Pratibha Patil’s nomination?” is a common refrain of UPA MPs when referring to the selection of this dark horse. Apparently all women are supposed to rejoice that a big blow for womankind has been struck. Even Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, while speaking to a group of women journalists recently, called it a red letter day for women. After 60 years, one of their sex was being elected to the highest office in the land.

I don’t notice feminists exactly jumping for joy at Patil’s selection. No doubt, they recognise that she was chosen as a cynical ploy to get around the impasse created by the Left. After the Congress’s first preferences for the post were turned down, by sheer chance a CPI member suggested appointing a woman candidate. The Communists now take credit for this ‘path breaking’ decision. It is, of course, another matter that till two years ago no woman had even been appointed to the CPM Politburo and even the half a dozen females in the Central Committee are wives or siblings of party leaders. So thrilled was the UPA selection committee with the symbolic gesture that it took barely six minutes to clear Patil’s name, even though most UPA allies were unaware just who Patil was and even some in the Congress were only vaguely familiar with her name.

Interestingly, as the UPA Government bats for Patil, another woman, Veena Sikri, has gone to court accusing the government of unfairly depriving her of the foreign secretary’s post because of a gender bias. Sikri points out that she was senior to the man who superceded her and was equally qualified. The foreign office is not ruffled by charges of gender bias. It feels it has proved its credentials by appointing a woman as foreign secretary a few years back. The woman selected as India’s first foreign secretary was, like Patil, completely taken aback at having hit the jack pot. She was, after all, no high flier; she had never worked in any position of consequence in South Block. As with Patil, she was lifted out of obscurity in a Machiavellian move to deprive a deserving male. The senior-most official in the then PMO wanted a free reign in the MEA and he thought the woman candidate would fit in ideally.

Such tokenism is common in our polity. Symbolic representatives are selected because they belong to one or another disadvantaged minority whom the establishment would like to mollify. The Congress has developed a special knack for inducting token representatives who have no power base of their own even within their respective communities. Ahmed Patel and Ghulam Nabi Azad are taken as the representatives of the Muslim community in the party, although the community looks more to Arjun Singh to speak on its behalf. The Congress’s representatives from the dalits such as Sushil Kumar Shinde, Meira Kumar and Kumari Selja, lack an all-India standing and popularity within their own community. And Mayawati has managed to wean away the dalit vote from the Congress because the Congress only paid lip service to their cause.

... contd.

Ads By Google

Message*	Maximum characters allowed

Name*		Email ID*
Subject*		Country*

TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).

I agree to the terms of use.