
Even if McCormack did make such a statement, it would be plain to anyone who has read the Indo-US 123 agreement that McCormack is wrong, plain and simple, as there is nothing in that agreement that either mentions any “test” or any circumstance under which “all nuclear cooperation is terminated” automatically. Under Article 14(1) the agreement can be terminated only a year after a written notice to terminate the agreement is given by a party.
It is very likely that the story and the controversy built around it are a major element in the continuing disinformation campaign that has been mounted by the opponents of the Indo-US nuclear deal.
Nevertheless, the issue of India conducting a nuclear test and what happens after that is a matter that should be analysed in some detail.
But such a termination is not automatic. Such termination will not take place, according to Section 129(a) of the AEA, “if the President determines that cessation of such exports would be seriously prejudicial to the achievement of United States non-proliferation objectives or otherwise jeopardize the common defense and security”.
Article 14(2) of the India-UA agreement explicitly acknowledges this prerogative...


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications