




While giving time to the Government to submit its status report about the steps taken in this regard, a Bench, comprising Justice C K Thakker and Justice Dalveer Bhandari, said: “We are keeping all the questions open in view of the fact that the Act would be implemented by December-end ... We grant some time to the Government to submit its position about the steps taken by the Committee in the meantime.”
The Supreme Court noted that the Centre at every hearing was seeking time to implement the legislation, which was passed by both the Houses of Parliament and had received the President’s assent on August 23, 2006.
Adjourning the matter till November-end, the Bench observed that crucial time has been wasted since the filing of the petition three years ago.
Explaining the delay, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran said: “Since it involved integration of various enactments and orders... the decision regarding nodal ministry to administer this Act took considerable time.”
Meanwhile, raising doubts over the Government’s efforts, the petitioner’s counsel, Prashant Bhushan, said the Act an amalgamation of various existing laws. Bhushan argued that all carbonated drinks should disclose the composition and contents of the products and additives on the bottle, package or container.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications