
And this at a time when India faced US sanctions after the Pokharan tests, almost a world away from the current New Delhi-Washington engagement.
Between 1999 and 2003, there was not one case of Fulbright visa rejection. No scholar was asked by the NDA government to change his or her research subject except one in 2003-04. Even that was more semantic than anything else: New York scholar Rachel J Anthes changed her subject from “From sacred whore to sex worker” to “The Sacred Feminine.” And she was allowed to do research in the institution of her choice, Sanskriti Pratishthan, New Delhi. US officials say that visa clearances came within the stipulated time-frame of three months or, at worst, four months.
Some of the subjects that the NDA raised no objections to: study of Hindu religious reform movement, ethics of religion and politics, local roots of religious nationalism, Brahma Kumaris and globalisation, religion in campuses, labour diaspora in the Middle-East and Brahmin authority and patronage.
Said then HRD Secretary S C Tripathi: “We believed there was no need for Intelligence Bureau to clear Fulbright scholars.” So on content, too, official records show that unlike in the UPA regime, the NDA wasn’t playing the thought police. Consider some of the subjects cleared by the NDA:
1999-2000
Interface between religion and medicine in Tibetan transformation of Indian medical models
The production of pilgrimage maps in Haridwar and Varanasi
2000-01
Modern Indian history
Periyapuranam and...


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications