Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Indian Express >  International > 
Font Size

Lawmakers knew of torture techniques, didn’t object

Print Email Feedback Discuss
Rate Article
Rating:  
LA Times-Washington Post Posted: Dec 10, 2007 at 0110 hrs IST
WASHINGTON, DECEMBER 9 In September 2002, four members of Congress met in secret for a first look at a unique CIA programme designed to wring vital information from reticent terrorism suspects in US custody.

For more than an hour, the bipartisan group, which included future-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, was given a virtual tour of the CIA’s detention sites and the harsh techniques interrogators had devised to make their prisoners talk.

Among the techniques described, said two officials present, was waterboarding, a practice that years later would be condemned as torture by Democrats and some Republicans on Capitol Hill. But on that day, no objections were raised. “The briefer was specifically asked if the methods were tough enough,” said a US official, who witnessed the exchange.

Waterboarding as an interrogation technique has its roots in some of history’s worst totalitarian nations, from Nazi Germany and the Spanish Inquisition to North Korea and Iraq. In the US, the technique was first used five decades ago as a training tool to give US troops a realistic sense of what they could expect if captured.

Ads By Google

Related Stories:

Long before “waterboarding” entered the public discourse, the CIA gave key legislative overseers about 30 private briefings, some of which included descriptions of that technique and other harsh interrogation methods.

No formal objections were raised by the lawmakers briefed about the harsh methods during the two years in which waterboarding was employed, from 2002 to 2003, said Democrats and Republicans.

Congressional officials say the groups’ ability to challenge the practices was hampered by strict rules of secrecy that prohibited them from being able to take notes or consult legal experts or members of their own staffs.

“In fairness, the environment was different then because we were closer to September 11,” said a US official present during the briefings. “But there was no objecting, no hand-wringing. The attitude was, ‘We don’t care what you do to those guys as long as you get the information you need to protect Americans’.”

GOP lawmakers and Bush administration officials previously said members of Congress were well-informed and supportive of the CIA’s use of harsh interrogation techniques. But the details of who in Congress knew what, and when about waterboarding have not previously been disclosed.

In September 2006, the CIA for the first time briefed all members of the House and Senate intelligence committees, producing some heated exchanges with CIA officials, including Director Michael Hayden. The CIA director said during a TV...

Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient's name *
*Recipient's e-mail address *
(multiple addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name's and e-mail address'es you provide will not
be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient's of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close