Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Indian Express >  Sports > 
Font Size

This selection was just about the numbers

Print Email Feedback Discuss
Rate Article
Rating:  
Harsha Bhogle Posted: Dec 27, 2007 at 0912 hrs IST
Anil Kumble has a peculiar problem. Among the batsmen he doesn’t know whom to drop and among the bowlers he doesn’t know whom to pick! We reap as we sow! If you glorify batsmen, you don’t produce bowlers. In the movies they want to become stars not extras. And so Kumble had to bowl seam-up in Bangalore. Great thinking, good variation, no option. If bowling seam-up and getting the ball to scuttle along on a low pitch was the way to win a Test, someone else should have been bowling those. If not at Kumble’s end, at the other. So does it mean that there is no one to hit the deck hard, at a decent pace, at around the good length mark? Someone simple and unassuming, with a simple run-up and a focused mind? And so, as Kumble has re-discovered, the problem with having a big heart is that everything comes your way. As, I suspect, Rahul Dravid is going to discover in Australia!

So then as Australia, the spiritual home of hit-the-deck bowling, looms what are India’s options going to be? Or is this a no-options selection? I’m trying to be optimistic here but I am struggling. Of the five areas selectors would typically look at; opening batting, middle order batting, wicket keeping, spin bowling and new-ball bowling (notice I haven’t said quick bowling!), India seem to have options in two: middle order batting and wicket keeping. Of the two spinners, maybe three, realistically available, two were picked. But of the rest, it was a question of making the numbers, rather than sorting from them; of adding rather than deleting which is what a healthy selection situation should be.

Ads By Google

Related Stories:

The selectors had one opener and had to conjure three and whichever way you look at it, Sehwag’s selection is about desperation, not inspiration. The only contender was Aakash Chopra and the fact that he wasn’t picked confirms my old view that shortlists can rarely be read into. So that list of 24 was either a decoy for journalists or a boring academic exercise; the kind school boys would indulge in during a physics class when they don’t understand much of what is going on. A third opener should have been picked, but clearly there isn’t one in India. I hope Robin Uthappa is looking at this squad and hurting. Given the choices available he should have walked in, never has...

Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views represented here are not neccesarily endorsed by www.expressindia.com and its allied websites. All messages will be moderated and no message that has inflammatory, abusive, derogatory language or any language deemed unfit for publication by the editor will be displayed. Though it will be endeavoured that as many messages as possible be displayed, there will be time lag between the submission and publication of the messages. The website reserves the right to publish or reject any message.
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient's name *
*Recipient's e-mail address *
(multiple addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name's and e-mail address'es you provide will not
be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient's of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close