Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Newsletter | ePaper
Indian Express >  National Network > 

No Jallikattu during Pongal, says SC

Font Size
Express news service Posted: Jan 12, 2008 at 0118 hrs IST
Related Stories: Bachchan taken ill on birthdayAlphonsa’s friend feels blessed to witness her canonisationTamper-proof kerosene: there’s proof it can be tamperedGay pride: laws and outlawsThank YouTerror mail trail leads cops to MSU
NEW DELHI, JANUARY 11: The Supreme Court on Friday refused permission to hold ‘Jallikattu’ or bull fight, a centuries old event that attracts thousands of people during Pongal harvest festival in Tamil Nadu, saying it was “barbaric” and amounted to cruelty against animals.

“We are not inclined to vacate the stay ordered by this court on the event,” a Bench headed by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan said, putting a ban at least for this year.

The interim decision invited mixed reactions. While animal activists hailed the order, owners of bulls who had come to Delhi for the hearing, criticised the same saying they would suffer huge monetary losses as a fallout of the decision.

“We will not allow fight between man and a bull,” affirmed the bench also comprising Justices R V Raveendran and J M Panchal while hearing an appeal filed by the Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI). It, however, allowed ‘Rekla’ (bullock-cart) race under the supervision of the authorities.

The AWBI had highlighted that Jallikattu could not be deemed as a sport since it entailed varied forms of cruelties to ‘participant’ bulls. Finding merit in the argument, the Bench said, “There’s no law in the country, which permits it.”

Ads By Google
Senior advocate T R Andhyarjuna for the respondents that included the state of Tamil Nadu contested the ruling. “There isn’t any law to prohibit it also,” he argued seeking that popular sport be allowed at least for this year as deep social, religious sentiments were attached to it. The state Government further attempted to allay fears of causing any injury or loss of human lives as the counsel sought to assure that it will have a team of doctors to see that animals are not brutalised.

The appellant had highlighted how during the last year’s event, one person was killed and as many as 65 were wounded.

Earlier, while issuing notices to the state and others, the apex court had stayed a Madras High Court order of March 9, 2007 wherein a Division Bench had set aside an earlier order of restraining the brutal practice of bull race and bull fight.

Ads By Google
Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient(s) name *
*Recipient(s) e-mail address *
(Separate addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name(s) and e-mail address(es) you provide will
not be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient(s) of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close