IE Highlights

Search
Indian Express
Web
Advanced Search
Search Archives

Advertisments

Matrimonials Register FREE on Naukri.com. Get cash upto Rs 10 Lakhs No minimum balance NRI account Rs.250 cashback for credit cards* Buy Original Microsoft Software Book International flights & get 10000 Money Back

Send Flowers

Find Love, Romance & friends

Live Cricket

Front Page

WEB EXCLUSIVE: ARUN SHOURIE - PART 2

On their own yardstick

Arun Shourie

Posted online: Thursday, March 27, 2008 at 1225 hrs Print Email


 

An enormous portion of the funds have been diverted – for paying salaries, for defraying office expenses, for paying outstanding bills, for other schemes.

Works said to have been completed do not exist; works have been ‘completed’ in non-existent villages; in other cases they have been taken up in villages that are already ‘fully covered’; works have been abandoned – in typical cases, pipes have been laid only part of the distance, pools have been dug where there is no water.

Guidelines provide that the quality of water must be assessed: it is not assessed at all – water treatment plants have just not been installed as required.

One half the Rural Protected Water Supply projects and a fifth of the tubewells shown as ‘completed’, found to be ‘non-functional’ or abandoned.

In state after state, the expenditure figures turn out to be manifestly inflated; they turn out to be not just without authorization but ‘fictitious’.

The Guidelines have provided a remedy very close to Chidambram’s heart – they require that Village Monitoring Committees and Special Monitoring and Inspection Units be set up; the CAG finds that in 14 states the committees are not holding regular meetings; 21 states have not nominated the required officials from the Health Department; 15 states have not established Special Monitoring and Investigation Units; in the remaining 11 states, these MIUs do not carry out field-level monitoring of quality of water, adequacy of service, etc.

Guidelines require that the central and state governments monitor and evaluate the works from time to time: in 22 states, no evaluation studies have been carried out at all; in 17 states, officials from state headquarters have not visited districts, blocks and villages for inspections.

A ‘flagship’?

Or the tattered rag covering a sunken vessel?

(To be continued)

For all stories visit www.indianexpress.com/arunshourie

 1  |  2  |  3  Single Page View

Ads By Google

Post CommentView CommentsWrite to Editor

All Headlines All Front Page News
Your comment[s] on this article


Be the first to comment on this story.

Total comment[s]:0 | Read comment[s]| Post your comment

 
Full Coverage

The CM WritesTaking on NaxalsBenazir's AssassinationThird EyeMandate 2007

Most Read Articles

Indian Parivar LeagueMystery death of Bengal officer who exposed NREG fraud10 years after n-tests, Pokharan museum could do with a loan waiver, its school with teachersSurge in Pak arms sale to Sri Lanka worries IndiaIn cyclone chaos, Myanmar junta seeks votes

Most Emailed Articles

After Kalam OK to n-deal, SP signals a rethink: Let UPA give us new factsIndian Parivar LeagueCong-BJP coalition should run country: Ex-Speaker Purno Sangma’s bold ideaMystery death of Bengal officer who exposed NREG fraud10 years after n-tests, Pokharan museum could do with a loan waiver, its school with teachers