
A considerable body of research has emerged that shows that the British attempts at census classifications and ethnological categorisations strengthened and concretised a rather fluid, hazy and amorphous social system that prevailed in India prior to their arrival. But the British did not invent our obsession with the genetic principle, with hierarchical descriptors and hereditary occupations. As efficient, if slightly obtuse, administrators they merely stated with clarity what we as a people believed and practiced in a confused way.
Since it is politically fashionable to blame the British for all our woes, one can as an aside note that the insistence on persons having “surnames” may have unintentionally helped strengthen caste. Having had no tradition of surnames, many fell into the trap of calling themselves Narayana Nair, Narayana Mudaliar, Narayana Gowda, Narayana Reddy, Narayan Bhosale, Narayan Varma, Narayan Chatterjee, Narayan Gupta, Narayan Sharma and so on, all of which invariably revealed the caste origins of the individuals. The film industry realised that if they had to appeal to broader audiences, a “decastification” process was a good idea. Plain Ashok Kumar was preferred to Ashok Kumar Ganguly. When Yusuf Khan adopted a Hindoo name, clearly he did not want to align...


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications