Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Newsletter | ePaper
Indian Express >  Op-Ed > 

RTI is good

Font Size
Suman K Jha Posted: May 01, 2008 at 2246 hrs IST
Related Stories: The feudal and the industrialAnti-Christian violenceMinority reportPlaying with fireUPA’s inverted logicThe perfect Hindu home
: The editorial in the latest issue of Organiser, while decrying the move to rope in an MNC to check the efficacy of RTI implementation, admits that the legislation has helped the aam aadmi. “... Recently a man in Orissa got relief from the court after he proved that the forest department was unduly delaying and denying him permission to cut a certain number of trees on his land — to raise money for his son’s education. The department had given similar sanctions on a larger scale for industrial houses and business propositions. This information he obtained by repeated petitions under the RTI... Even in a limited way, RTI has become an effective instrument for determined citizens to nettle the government... And that is why it is necessary to safeguard its efficacy and not allow the Government to take back on the sly what it gave in a grand gesture, albeit grudgingly,” observes the leader.

The edit, however, thinks that the move to involve an MNC will only help bureaucrats. It says, “By getting a survey done by an MNC, the department can cite various reasons, including the ‘holy cow’ of national security to deny citizens access to information locked in government files...”

False claims in Nepal

Ads By Google
In an analysis, Arabinda Ghose says that the Maoist claims of ‘a sweeping victory’ in Nepal are grossly exaggerated. He says: “As someone who has been following the telecasts of Nepal TV — an official organ — since April 10, this writer fails to finds any sweep for the Maoists...

“There were three phases of the elections for the Constituent Assembly which will have a strength of 601 members — larger than the Lok Sabha of India which has 545 members including two nominated from among the Anglo-Indian community... The initial results which had excited many commentators in this country were for the 240 seats under the first past the post (FPTP) system. Of these, the Maoists have won just 120 seats, half of the total and hence one seat short of majority.”

Ghose goes on to say that “In the same phase, voting took place also for the 335 seats under the Proportional Representation (PR) system, under which it will be the number of votes polled by the individual political parties that will determine the number of seats in the assembly. The latest result showed that the Maoists have polled less than 30 per cent...

Ads By Google
Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient(s) name *
*Recipient(s) e-mail address *
(Separate addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name(s) and e-mail address(es) you provide will
not be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient(s) of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close