




For years, poor quality and indifferent workmanship was reason enough to buy ‘foreign’. Part of the mistrust was doubtlessly related to the Indian ability to happily reproduce second rate clones of foreign ideas; part was however related to the belief that people of culture and religion were not expected to be materially advanced or technically progressive. It is an idea that has percolated to all levels of the visible man-made landscape. From flyovers that are over designed, to trains that are antiquated, to airports that are inefficient, to road systems that breed chaos, to hospitals signs that mislead, it takes a mere glance out of a car window to reinforce the idea of India as a perennially incomplete and visibly incoherent environment. Is it a surprise, then, to see the expression of utter disbelief on first-time riders in the Delhi Metro? How can a public work of such finesse be accomplished here?
A deep and abiding disdain for India and its conditions makes any foreign idea a favoured option, however ill-conceived its application. It has taken the politician and bureaucrat 60 years of tireless foreign study tours to look for solutions to Indian problems. A two-week tour of Sydney to study Olympic facilities, a week to study expressway interchanges in Los Angeles, a month of serious scrutiny of the Brazilian rain forest, a careful week-long assessment of the Russian metro system, a thorough investigation of Singapore and Hong Kong airports. All, to what effect? Is there any similarity between Hong Kong, and say, Delhi airport? In fact, is there any similarity between Hong Kong and Delhi? Are Indian forests any better preserved after the...


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications