




The Pan-IIM Alumni Association contended that the Government had misinterpreted the Supreme Court judgment which, while upholding the OBC reservation policy, had said that it would not be applicable to higher educational institutions.
“The Act has to be understood in the way the Supreme Court has understood it and with the safeguard which has been put by the Court,” senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for the petitioner, said while accusing the Centre of running an agenda in the name of reservation.
He contended that the five-judge Constitution Bench judgment clearly says that caste cannot be the basis of reservation and it can only be a starting point. “If a particular caste has got a substantial number of graduates then that particular caste has to go,” Salve said, adding that a student has to clear twin tests of educational and social backwardness to get the benefit of reservation. “If you are a graduate, then you belong to the creamy layer and reservation cannot be given to you,” he contended.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications