Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Newsletter | ePaper
Indian Express >  Edits & Columns > 

History, abridged

Font Size
Posted: Jun 17, 2007 at 2243 hrs IST
Related Stories: Sangh Poori Bahar RSS tells BJP top brass: OK, we won’t micro-manage youRSS sacks five pracharaks for ‘straying’ from ideology’99 murder bid: 6 RSS men held guiltyRSS wants ‘atonement pooja’ after MLA’s visit to templeGuard kidnaps toddler; security firm has no records
Given how seriously the RSS insists that history is serious business, it is extraordinary that it should display such naiveté in dealing with a pretender claiming to possess science-backed historical insight. Or maybe it is not surprising at all. As our story on Sunday made clear the RSS was most impressed because Puneesh Taneja, holder of creatively forged visiting cards, was telling it what it wants to hear — that the Sethusamudram project is not history-neutral. To be discerning and circumspect when dealing with like-minded interlocutors is not a common political trait. Still, the RSS has reason to be especially embarrassed. First, it is always lecturing politicians about their superficiality. And, second, wasn’t there anyone in the RSS who thought of making a simple background check? Put it this way. How could the sangh really think that an officer from the UPA PMO could spend two years in Nagpur and hope to rejoin office?

That is definitely worth a chuckle or two. But it is also terribly worrying. We do not subscribe to the view that there is or even that there should be only one kind of history. Let ideas and ideologies contest. But let that battle be informed by minimum standards of scholarship and competence. The religious Right in India has a problem in this regard, although it will never admit it, not even after being led up a mythical bridge by a very ordinary fraudster. The Left, on the other hand, has produced most of India’s good historians. Rather sadly, India hasn’t produced any historian of note who is an uncompromising economic liberal and intelligently politically conservative.

Ads By Google
Such laments, of course, are not a luxury policymakers tasked with planning the Sethusamudram project can afford. Their job is unenviably tough — not even the most solid geological explanation can dissuade those mixing mythology and science. And of course the BJP, which enthusiastically did survey work for the project when in power, can’t now see facts. Puneesh Taneja, ex-pracharak, would approve.

Ads By Google
Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient(s) name *
*Recipient(s) e-mail address *
(Separate addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name(s) and e-mail address(es) you provide will
not be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient(s) of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close