




“It is a humane problem and is required to be solved with human touch,” observed a Bench headed by Justice C K Thakker.
The Bench, which also comprised Justice D K Jain, noted that in selecting a guardian, the court exercises parens patriae and is expected, and indeed bound to give due weight to a child’s comfort, contentment, health, education, intellectual development and favourable surroundings.
The Bench even asked courts to consider “moral and ethical values” which, it felt, “cannot be ignored” while deciding as to who should get the custody rights. According to the apex court, “they are equally, even more important, essential and indispensable considerations”.
Setting aside the trial court’s decision, upheld by the High Court of West Bengal, the Bench agreed that character of the proposed guardian was one of the issues required to be considered by a court of law. In the present case, the father, Abhijit Kundu, is facing a criminal trial for the murder of his wife, Mithi Kundu, over dowry demands.
Finding infirmities in the earlier decisions, the SC allowed the grandparents to be the guardians of the child.


Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications