Lord Paul has now alleged that he lost because the entire Indian delegation did not cast their votes in his favour. I wonder how he could take India’s support for granted and assume that because he was once an Indian national, all Indian delegates would vote for him on that basis alone, without taking other relevant factors into consideration.
Further, it is very strange and reckless for him that I was ‘hiding’ from him in Kuala Lumpur. As the leader of the Indian delegation, with a very hectic conference schedule to follow, there was no scope of paths of members not to cross - as indeed ours did! It is also incomprehensible that Lord Paul now seeks to hold the high moral ground on the basis of what the Pakistani delegates are supposed to have told him about Indians and that we should be ‘ashamed’ of ourselves!
It is important to note that the voting for the election of the chairman was by secret ballot. I have no personal knowledge as to how any delegate voted, Indian or otherwise. If Lord Paul’s assessment is correct, then by his own admission, sections of the Indian delegates may have voted for him, Hence, the deficit of 50 votes by which he lost, cannot—by any stretch of the imagination— be accounted for by the Indian delegation alone.
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
