Indian Express
Sign In | Register Now
Newsletter | ePaper
Indian Express > 

When there’ll be no Indian left behind

Font Size
Sudheendra Kulkarni Posted: Dec 23, 2007 at 0119 hrs IST
Related Stories: Measuring the distance in hopeThe silver lining to the economic cloudAmerica’s learning curveIgnoring the Assam alarmFixing our nonfunctional ParliamentImporting a ‘Made-in-America’ crisis
The verbal duel between Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh and Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi at Wednesday’s meeting of the National Development Council has again highlighted an issue that has serious long-term implications for India’s unity and integrity.

Should there be separate earmarking of 15 per cent of the targets and outlays for minorities, as is envisaged in the Eleventh Five Year Plan? Modi, backed by other BJP chief ministers, has slammed the move as “divisive” and not “in the interest of maintaining the social fabric of the nation”. No, said Dr Singh. “Inclusiveness does mean better targeting and it is not at the cost of other groups. You will all agree that if we hope to have a prosperous, equitable, just India, we must cover all groups and ensure that no one is left behind... (Our)

focus is on the most marginalised sections of society.”

The prime minister’s defence contains a dangerous conceptual flaw, which is sought to be covered over by pious intentions that are unassailable. Shouldn’t growth be inclusive? Shouldn’t we ensure that no group is left behind? The answer has to be a full-throated “Yes”. However, the problem arises when we dig deeper, as we must, to get to the bottom of the UPA government’s “communal budgeting” plan. The digging will make us realise what a quagmire India could get into, in the years to come, unless we free ourselves from this majority-minority trap. Are all religions minorities, and do all people belonging to each minority, qualify as “the most marginalised sections of society” needing separate plan allocations? Certainly not.

Ads By Google
True, many Muslims in many states have the misfortune of being poor and marginalised. Not to empathise with their misfortune is to betray a lack of patriotism and humanity. But do all Muslims in India share this misfortune? Remember that Dr Singh has not mentioned any socio-economic criteria to determine beneficiaries of specially earmarked resources. An undifferentiated reference to “minorities” would make even Azim Premji in Karnataka, A.R. Antulay in Maharashtra, Mohammed Azharuddin in Andhra Pradesh, and Shahnawaz Hussain in Bihar eligible for special treatment. And since Sikhs are considered a minority in most parts of the country (including in Assam, where the prime minister is domiciled), do Dr Singh and Dr Montek Singh Ahluwalia, deputy chairman of the Planning Commission that prepared the plan, also deserve special consideration? Is this better targeting, Dr Singh?

Clubbing undifferentiated “minorities” together with the Scheduled Castes and Tribes also begs other questions. Is there any justification in believing that all Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Parsis and other minorities (West Bengal has recently declared Jains a minority) have been the victims of discrimination (as Scheduled Castes have been, historically) or marginalisation (as Scheduled Tribes are, even today)? Congress and Communist leaders seem to believe so. Such belief is an endorsement of the extremist Muslim organisations’ consistent propaganda that Muslims can expect no justice in a Hindu-majority India. For the Congress, such belief is also tantamount to its own self-indictment since the party has ruled India for the longest period since Independence.

... contd.

Ads By Google
Post Comments
Message*
Maximum characters allowed     
 
Name* Email ID*
Subject* Country*
TERMS OF USE:
The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
I agree to the terms of use.
View all Messages [ 0 ]
View all Messages [ 0 ]
Group Websites : Express India | Financial Express | Screen India | Loksatta | Kashmir Live | Biz Publications
Privacy Policy | Feedback | Site MapThe Indian Express Group | Work With Us | Adverise With Us | Contact Us© 2008 Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved
*Recipient(s) name *
*Recipient(s) e-mail address *
(Separate addresses by commas)
*Your Name *
*Your e-mail address *
Select your Country
Comments(optional)

The name(s) and e-mail address(es) you provide will
not be used for any purpose other than to inform the
recipient(s) of your identity. (*mandatory field)
 
Close