US arts panel finds King statue ‘confrontational’, wants it reworked

The US Commission of Fine Arts thinks “the colossal scale and Social Realist style of the proposed statue recalls a genre of political sculpture that has recently been pulled down in other countries,” commission secretary Thomas Luebke said in a letter in April.

By law, no project like the memorial can go forward without approval from the commission, the federal agency that advises the Government on public design and aesthetics in the capital.

A model of the statue has been built in China. The project’s chief architect, Ed Jackson Jr, huddled with advisers this week in Ann Arbor, Mich, to discuss ways to address the commission’s objections before sculpting of the granite begins.

The $100 million memorial, which is being built largely with private donations by the Washington, DC, Martin Luther King Jr National Memorial Project Foundation, is planned for a crescent-shaped four-acre site among Washington’s famed cherry trees on the northwest shore of the basin. Construction is expected to start this year and end next year.

The centerpiece is to be a 2 1/2-story sculpture of the civil rights leader carved in a giant chunk of granite. Called the Stone of Hope, it would depict King, standing with his arms folded, looming from the stone. At 28 feet tall, it would be eight feet taller than the statue of Abraham Lincoln in the Lincoln Memorial.

The King memorial has been authorised by Congress, and a groundbreaking ceremony was held in 2006. Its general design was approved by the seven-member federal commission that year, based on drawings.

Commission members said the sculpture “now features a stiffly frontal image, static in pose, confrontational in character,” Luebke wrote. They “recommended strongly that the sculpture be reworked, both in form and modeling” and cited “precedents of a figure emerging from stone in the works of sculptors such as Michelangelo and Rodin.”

“It’s hard for me to put my arms around”...