PAF has the advantage, we are sure to have losses: Arjan told Chavan
For Marshal of the Air Force Arjan Singh, the 1965 war was a monumental challenge: as IAF chief at the time, his dated and old fighter fleet scrambled up against a blisteringly potent PAF, armed, alarmingly at the time, with air-to-air missiles. The war ended after just 21 days, but anxiety levels had begun to brim over long before operations began.
In an interview to The Sunday Express, Singh revealed, for the first time ever, his word of caution to then Defence Minister YB Chavan just before IAF fighters blasted off from Pathankot early on September 1, 1965.
‘‘It speaks volumes of Chavan that he gave us approval for air strikes in just five minutes. But I warned him about two things: that we were sure to have losses, since the PAF was very close at Sargodha, and I also told him that since the IAF and Army hadn’t had time to brief each other, it was possible that we would hit our own troops from the air. As it turned out, this did happen,’’ Singh said.
While things levelled out in the West, Singh admits that his force was ‘‘rather complacent’’ about the Eastern Sector. ‘‘Our commanders there should have been more aggressive. You can never win without being aggressive.’’
A more controversial aspect is the much-disected conversation between Singh and his PAF counterpart Asghar Khan earlier that year during Pakistan’s armoured incursion into Kutch. Khan called Singh and suggested that both air forces keep away from the conflict.
Later, Asghar Khan went on to justify the IAF’s lack of action in Kutch to his purported ‘‘threats’’ to Singh. That he did not consult Pak Army chief Gen Musa and President Ayub Khan, cost him his job two months later.
Singh, who remains in contact with his PAF counterparts of the time, remembers: ‘‘I agreed with him, because this was our stand too. We were just not prepared for a showdown in Kutch. Asghar was and is a close friend of mine, so is his successor Nur Khan. The high standards of efficiency of the PAF at the time were entirely because of Asghar’s dedication. They were both good colleagues and first class officers. When I visited Peshawar after the war, Nur Khan accommodated me in his own house.’’
In the final analysis, Singh feels the PAF was cautious because of limited resources, while the IAF kept away from full throttle because it thought the war would last much longer. The stakes for both, either way, were very high.
— SHIV AROOR
editor@expressindia.com
Total comment[s] :0| Read comment[s]| Post your comment
|
|
|
With blackout, China cracks down on largest Tibet protests in 20 yrsSt Stephen's acting principal Thampu's PhD fails UGC testUS Speaker Pelosi, who slammed China, on her way to meet Dalai LamaEx-HAL staffer pleads guilty in US to illegal exports for Indian missile programmeSC kisses off Gere's warrant, says case tarnishes India’s name
With blackout, China cracks down on largest Tibet protests in 20 yrsEx-HAL staffer pleads guilty in US to illegal exports for Indian missile programmeJapanese mother searches for son who disappeared in AgraSC warns of growing intoleranceAdvani: Cong a family fiefdom, top post reserved for Nehru dynasty
Your comment[s] on this article
Be the first to comment on this story.