Is there tacit understanding between WikiLeaks,US? asks media

Though the website is embarrassing “uncle Sam” by leaking thousands of documents,”it is worth noticing that most of the materials that were exposed are sensational in nature,yet minor pieces of information,and the negative effects of their release can pretty much be mitigated by some remedial work,” it said.

“The US State Department has condemned the WikiLeaks release,which seems only to have increased the credibility of the website. WikiLeaks claims that it has a large number of volunteers working all over the world with access to confidential information for free.

“The powerful and ubiquitous CIA has not been able to identify the source of the sudden leakage of diplomatic secrets. It sounds more or less unconvincing. Julian Assange,founder of WikiLeaks,is still on the run,despite his high public profile,” it said.

Is there some “tacit understanding” between the website and the US government? the daily asked. “It may be worth asking. And what does it mean to other countries that are on the radar screen of WikiLeaks.”

“If granted real authority,once WikiLeaks sets its sights on other countries,the fallout could be drastic.

Leaked information could severely damage the social stability of nations that are not able to handle the release of so much sensitive information.

“An information tsunami is flooding every country,but different countries have different abilities to control and absorb it. Countries like China,despite their rising status in the information world,must have a line of defence against a hurtful information campaign,” it said.

The Chinese official media has been carrying in bits and pieces the leaks and some allegations like the politburo of the ruling Communist Party was behind the cyber attacks against the US and Google,early this year.

But,in general,it has refrained from carrying other sensitive leaks like growing irritation in Beijing over the actions of its ally North Korea,with some of its diplomats calling it a “spoilt child.”

The allegations were immediately refuted by official Chinese analysts.

Pang Zhongying,a scholar on international politics with the Beijing-based Renmin University of China,dismissed such “allegations”,saying that they lack credibility.

“It’s just the speculation of some US diplomats,” Pang was quoted by another official newspaper ‘China Daily’ as saying.

A serious reply to the report would be unnecessary and could “exaggerate the impact”,he said,adding diplomatic cables nowadays are less mysterious thanks to the Internet.

It seems the impact on international relations would be rather limited than predicted by the media.